Ulrich Eckhardt writes:
> So again, why is one faster than the other? What am I missing?
The .format() syntax is actually a function, and that alone carries some
overload. Even optimizing the lookup may give a little advantage:
>>> from timeit import Timer
>>> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c
Am 23.04.2013 10:26, schrieb Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
consider using string % formatting rather than the format metho
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> # Using Python 3.3.
>
> py> from timeit import Timer
> py> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c = 'eggs'"
> py> t1 = Timer("'%s, %s and %s for breakfast' % (a, b, c)", setup)
> py> t2 = Timer("'{}, {} and {} for breakfast'.format(a, b, c)", s
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:46:53 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>> If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds
>> off, consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
>
> Why? I don't see any obvious difference b
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
> Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>>
>> If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
>> consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
>
>
> Why? I don't see any obvious difference
Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
Why? I don't see any obvious difference between the two...
Greetings!
Uli
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
