Re: possible to preserve subprocess.Popen objects for later?

2007-06-22 Thread Ratko
> Sounds like you might want to consider running the backround task as > either a service or daemon and communicate via a TCP/IP connection or > a named pipe rather than using STDIN/OUT. Actually you could use > either idea without actually setting up a daemon. Unfortunately I don't have control

Re: possible to preserve subprocess.Popen objects for later?

2007-06-21 Thread zacherates
On Jun 21, 6:32 pm, Ratko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a python gui app that launches multiple applications using > subprocess.Popen class and prints their output in the gui (using > PIPEs, threads and wxPython). Everything works great but the problem > is that some applications

Re: possible to preserve subprocess.Popen objects for later?

2007-06-21 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Ratko schrieb: > Hi all, > > I have a python gui app that launches multiple applications using > subprocess.Popen class and prints their output in the gui (using > PIPEs, threads and wxPython). Everything works great but the problem > is that some applications should run in the background (ie they

possible to preserve subprocess.Popen objects for later?

2007-06-21 Thread Ratko
Hi all, I have a python gui app that launches multiple applications using subprocess.Popen class and prints their output in the gui (using PIPEs, threads and wxPython). Everything works great but the problem is that some applications should run in the background (ie they don't close when the gui c