Hi,
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Stef Mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> For several reasons I still use Python version 2.5.
> I understand that the print-statement will be replaced in Python version
> 3.0.
>
> At the moment I want to extend the print statement with an optional
> traceback.
> So I'v
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
hello,
For several reasons I still use Python version 2.5.
I understand that the print-statement will be replaced in Python
version 3.0.
At the moment I want to extend the print statement with an optional
traceback.
So I've 2 options:
1- make a ne
Stef Mientki wrote:
hello,
For several reasons I still use Python version 2.5.
I understand that the print-statement will be replaced in Python version
3.0.
At the moment I want to extend the print statement with an optional
traceback.
So I've 2 options:
1- make a new function, like "eprint
Hello,
I had found some article on this some months ago, can't remember where
exactly...
But if you don't want harassments, I'd just advise you to create a
function with a properly specific name (like "exprint()"), and to make
it mimic closely the signature and behaviour of Py3k's print() fu
Stef Mientki wrote:
> Now doesn't seem to be allowed,
> nor is there an import from __future__ :-(
>
> What's the best solution (other than moving to 2.6 or up ?
The word 'print' is a reserved word like is, class or def. You can't
have a function named 'print' in Python 2.5. You have to call you
hello,
For several reasons I still use Python version 2.5.
I understand that the print-statement will be replaced in Python version
3.0.
At the moment I want to extend the print statement with an optional
traceback.
So I've 2 options:
1- make a new function, like "eprint ()", where "e" stand
