when i search what top-post mean:
*top-post*: n., v.
[common] To put the newly-added portion of an email or Usenet response
before the quoted part, as opposed to the more logical sequence of
quoted portion first with original following.
*bottom-post*: v.In a news or mail reply, to put the resp
On 15Aug2014 09:47, luofeiyu wrote:
when i search what top-post mean:
top-post: n., v. [common] To put the newly-added portion of an email or
Usenet response before the quoted part, as opposed to the more logical
sequence of quoted portion first with original following.
bottom-post: v. In
In luofeiyu
writes:
> the best way is to excerpt only the relevent portions of the parent
> message ,not top-post nor bottom-post , right?
The followup text appears underneath the quoted parent message, thus
bottom-post.
--
John Gordon Imagine what it must be like for a real medical
luofeiyu writes:
> the best way is to excerpt only the relevent portions of the parent
> message ,not top-post nor bottom-post , right?
Correct; you should also interleave your responses in the context of the
relevant quoted material. See at the link I provided for this style
https://en.wikipedi
John Gordon writes:
> In luofeiyu
> writes:
>
> > the best way is to excerpt only the relevent portions of the parent
> > message ,not top-post nor bottom-post , right?
>
> The followup text appears underneath the quoted parent message, thus
> bottom-post.
“Bottom-post” usually refers to the
In Ben Finney
writes:
> "Bottom-post" usually refers to the inferior practice of quoting a
> message (entirely or large amounts) and then indiscriminately responding
> to all of it below all of the quoted text.
I was unaware of that meaning.
--
John Gordon Imagine what it must be lik
