On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of TurboGers Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates, could
you suggest
Try web.py. Very simple and powerful web framework.
http://webpy.org
-anand
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of TurboGers Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps...
Django is trivial to use for this (but you still want to use a DB together
with the built-in admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of TurboGers Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps...
IMHO, both.
If these are not good candidates, could
you suggest appropriate ones...
Hi folks,
Of TurboGers Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates, could
you suggest appropriate ones...
TIA,
/venkat
--
On 21 Mar 2006 17:06:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of TurboGers Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates, could
If you don't want to use RDBMS, I think Karrigell is better. Many
features of Django and TurboGears relate to database.
I've just begun looking at it, but I've also been impressed with Myghty.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
