On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 10:20:58 PM UTC+5:30, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Thank you , this answers my question : )
Hi, Thanks for asking this question, it introduced me to the timeit module.
Just a friendly, next time refrain yourself from top posting.
Cheers!
--
https://mail.python.org/mai
Thank you , this answers my question : )
On Apr 22, 2015 6:39 PM, "Michael Torrie" wrote:
>
> On 04/21/2015 09:31 PM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> > Iam not able to understand what why only 10 loops were run ? what
> > does this mean and how does this work ?
>
> I have a hunch you're mistakenly thinkin
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> I have a hunch you're mistakenly thinking that Python is only running
> through ten iterations of your for i in range(100) loop. This is
> not the case. The entire thing is running (all 100 iterations of
> your loop), but is run te
On 04/21/2015 09:31 PM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Iam not able to understand what why only 10 loops were run ? what
> does this mean and how does this work ?
I have a hunch you're mistakenly thinking that Python is only running
through ten iterations of your for i in range(100) loop. This is
not
Ganesh Pal writes:
> Iam running the below command on Linux machine have Python 2.7
> installed ,
If it hasn't already been said: You should be targeting Python 3
wherever possible (with the ‘python3’ command).
Since you're not in this case – and you are specifically testing Python
2 features –
Hi Team,
Iam running the below command on Linux machine have Python 2.7
installed , I was trying to figure out the speed difference between
xrange and range functions.
range :
python -m timeit 'for i in range(100):' ' pass'
10 loops, best of 3: 90.5 msec per loop
$ python -m timeit 'for i
