Trent Mick wrote:
>>if it doesn't, it wouldn't be the first time they'd (by accident or on
>>purpose) left things out.
>
>
> Other than SSL, do you have examples?
>
> > trust me, it'd cause a lot less confusion if
>
>>ActivePython was a true superset of the python.org distribution.
>
>
>
> if it doesn't, it wouldn't be the first time they'd (by accident or on
> purpose) left things out.
Other than SSL, do you have examples?
> trust me, it'd cause a lot less confusion if
> ActivePython was a true superset of the python.org distribution.
For every extension except SSL support
John Salerno wrote:
> Now, if the ActiveState distro *doesn't* include the libraries, then I
> would probably call it broken too. :)
if it doesn't, it wouldn't be the first time they'd (by accident or on
purpose) left things out. trust me, it'd cause a lot less confusion if
ActivePython was a
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> I still think the "get the official build (and add win32all if you're
> doing native windows stuff)" advice is sound, though.
Agreed. It seems silly to use anything other than the official release.
But anyway, I think the OP was confused about having to install the
sqlit
John Machin wrote:
> The Activestate Python 2.5 distribution is not yet available.
>
> (1) Why is the effbot saying that a not-yet available distribution is
> broken?
because I misread the "waiting for" in the first paragraph; Python 2.5
has been out for some while, and the OP's post didn't app
>> Looks like it could be from reading some
>> build-Python-from-source instructions for Unix platforms ...
Yes, Sorry. I read the doc too hastily.
>> If you're compiling the Python source yourself,
>> note that the source tree doesn't include the SQLite code,
>> only the wrapper module.
I'm
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> > Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> >
> >> wasting time on broken distributions?
> >
> > It's not broken.
>
> of course it's broken; the official release ships with properly built
> and properly tested versions of the stuff you're struggling to install.
>
> >
> > Either way I need to know where to put the sqlite files, right?
>
> not if you're using a proper release, no.
the easiest way to unbreak your ActiveState installation is probably to
install the python.org version, and copy
c:\Python25\DLLs\_sqlite3.pyd
and
c:\Python25\DLLs\sql
At Wednesday 11/10/2006 18:45, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> wasting time on broken distributions?
It's not broken. I like Pythonwin better than IDLE. Either way I need
to know where to put the sqlite files, right?
You can download Pythonwin (and the whole win32all packages) from
http://sourcef
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>> wasting time on broken distributions?
>
> It's not broken.
of course it's broken; the official release ships with properly built
and properly tested versions of the stuff you're struggling to install.
> I like Pythonwin better than IDLE.
l
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> wasting time on broken distributions?
It's not broken. I like Pythonwin better than IDLE. Either way I need
to know where to put the sqlite files, right?
rd
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> Sorry, I have a knack for making things more difficult than they need
> to be. I'm on Windows XP and waiting for the ActiveState release of
> Python 2.5. I want to experiment with sqlite and I see that Python 2.5
> has the "wrapper" but sqlite itself must be downloaded
Sorry, I have a knack for making things more difficult than they need
to be. I'm on Windows XP and waiting for the ActiveState release of
Python 2.5. I want to experiment with sqlite and I see that Python 2.5
has the "wrapper" but sqlite itself must be downloaded separately.
I see no installation
13 matches
Mail list logo
