Gary Robinson:
>(I could test the particular case I mention, but I'm wondering if someone has
>some fundamental knowledge that would lead to a basic understanding.)<
Java is one of the languages most avid of memory, often even more than
Python 2.x. Some bad people have said that Java developers
Gary Robinson writes:
> I'd be interested in knowing whether anybody can share info about
> how representative those test results are. For instance, suppose
> we're talking about a huge dictionary that maps integers to lists of
> integers (something I use in my code). Would something like that
> r
Honestly, the only performance data involving Java, that would ever
surprise me: is when a Java program takes less time to startup and get
going, then the computer it is being run from did ;).
When planning-ahead for a project, I look at what performance the
language implementations offer, in the
On Sep 30, 7:38 am, Gary Robinson wrote:
> The chart
> athttp://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all〈=ja...is very
> interesting to me because it shows CPython using much less memory than Java
> for most tests.
>
> I'd be interested in knowing whether anybody can share info ab
On Sep 30, 9:38 am, Gary Robinson wrote:
> The chart
> athttp://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ja...is
> very interesting to me because it shows CPython using much less memory than
> Java for most tests.
Which version of Python? If you're talking 3.x for Windows, a
The chart at
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=javasteady&lang2=python&box=1
is very interesting to me because it shows CPython using much less memory than
Java for most tests.
I'd be interested in knowing whether anybody can share info about how
representative
