7:28 AM
To: 'Eryk Sun'
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to
source code
Is this what you'd recommend doing when distributing a cython-generated code
compiled with cl. I want to distribute this in a windows or other o
MRAB wrote:
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris
wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
: 'python-list@python.org'
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
Yea, thanks a lot. That makes sense. I was testing it on my development
environment and got it to work that way, but I need to package it and test it
on my dual boot "user&
From: Eryk Sun
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 8:06 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH
&
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH to
> sitepackages:
In most cases an application should be isolated from PYTHON*
environment variables. If you're creating a Python application or
embedding Python in an application, use the embed
'
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
I downloaded VS community 2022 and I know how to access the developer command
prompt. I'm using the one called x64 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022
I ran a comman
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
I'm wait
arrys-emacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz <[3]jsch...@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Eryk Sun <[4]eryk...@gmail.com>; [5]python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access
to source cod
4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: Eryk Sun ; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
> On 4 Apr 2023, at 16:28, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Where can I download that cl program? I've used gcc before, but I hear
ubject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to
> source code
>
>> On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
>> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my sou
z
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my sou
On 4/1/2023 5:24 AM, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 20:24, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
> GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really
> understand licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with
> my worry abo
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license I pick. I’m not selling it now so it doesn’
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 13:16, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> > service [...]
>
> You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser
On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> service [...]
You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser runs
it every time you use the service (and probably while you aren't using
the servic
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 10:34, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Yea. You’re right. I probably need a lawyer someday. Thanks.
>
If your needs are basic, you shouldn't need a lawyer. Copyright law
and treaties DO protect you. But it's important to be aware that no
amount of legal protection - whether you hire
r who
> practices in this field.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Python-list On
>> Behalf Of Chris Angelico
>> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
>> To: python-list@python.org
>> Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
phone apps
developers include with their apps. And it would be good to consult a
lawyer who practices in this field.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python s
What license do I have to choose so people can't use my code? I don't know
this stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Cython can compile a script to C source code for a module or
executable (--embed). The source can be compiled and link
On 31/03/2023 13:00, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Others have commented that at some level it will always be thre but on a
more pragmatic level tools like py2
On 3/31/2023 10:14 AM, jkn wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source cod
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> > python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
>
>
>
> Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze, but that has the
> source code avail
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze, but that has the
source code available. So does pyinstaller. I think gcc does, too.
Does
On 22/03/17 21:57, M. R.P. wrote:
does anyone know were I can [find?] python source code programs?
Are you looking for the source to a Python language implementation
itself? If so, see this link:
https://www.python.org/downloads/
If not, what are you looking for, exactly? What sort of
On 03/22/2017 05:57 PM, M. R.P. wrote:
does anyone know were I can python source code programs?
The source code for cpython (i.e. the most common interpreter) can be
found here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/source/
https://github.com/python/cpython
Unless you mean the
does anyone know were I can python source code programs?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Malcolm Greene wrote:
> We're writing a DSL parser that generates Python code. While the size of
> our generated code will be small (< 32K), I wanted to re-assure the rest
> of our team that there are no reasonable code size boundaries that we
> need to be concerned about. I've searched for Python
> Heh, great question, and I'm curious too! But one place to get a bit more
> info is the standard library.
>
> rosuav@sikorsky:~/cpython/Lib$ find -name \*.py|xargs ls -lS|head
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rosuav rosuav 624122 Jul 17 17:38 ./pydoc_data/topics.py
Brilliant! :)
Thanks Chris!
Malcolm
--
http
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> We're writing a DSL parser that generates Python code. While the size of
> our generated code will be small (< 32K), I wanted to re-assure the rest
> of our team that there are no reasonable code size boundaries that we
> need to be concerne
We're writing a DSL parser that generates Python code. While the size of
our generated code will be small (< 32K), I wanted to re-assure the rest
of our team that there are no reasonable code size boundaries that we
need to be concerned about. I've searched for Python documentation that
covers max
On 18 January 2014 08:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 17 January 2014 00:58, Sam wrote:
> > I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof
> as long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
> >
> > Is it possible to protect python source code by compil
On 17 January 2014 00:58, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as
> long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
>
> Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
> Does .pyo offer better protection?
If
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:58:48 -0800, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof
> as long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
What makes you think that "pirates" will be the least bit interested in
your code? No offence intended, I
On 01/16/2014 05:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sam wrote:
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as
> long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
>
> Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
> Does .pyo offer better pro
Sam writes:
> I would like to protect my python source code.
Protect it from what? If there's some specific activity you want to
prevent or restrict, please say what it is, since “protect” is a rather
loaded term.
> It need not be foolproof as long as it adds inconvenience to pirate
On 1/16/14 7:58 PM, Sam wrote:
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does .pyo offer better protection?
First, .pyc and .pyo are
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does .pyo offer better protection?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jayden於 2012年9月28日星期五UTC+8下午7時57分14秒寫道:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
> that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really
> the case? Any way to protect your source code?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
On 9/28/2012 9:19 AM, stu...@molden.no wrote:
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among man
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
> This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
> In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among managers?
> What are you trying to protect y
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:18 AM, wrote:
> Python bytecode is not easier to hack than Java or .NET bytecodes.
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
In general though, why does it matter? What are you trying to protect
yourself against? If you're including
kl. 13:57:14 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jayden følgende:
> Dear All, I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
> told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it
> really the case? Any way to protect your source code? Thanks a lot! J
On 09/28/2012 02:17 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code.
Is it really the case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really the
case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks a lot!
Jayden
This question has been as
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> gmspro wrote:
> > Why is python source code not available on github?
Why should every free software project be available on a single proprietary
platform?
Also, see:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/03/hacker-commandeers-github-to-pro
gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/121885/focus=122111
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gmspro, 24.06.2012 02:16:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source code.
github != git.
You can use git to work on the sources if you wish. Just install a
Mercurial plugin for it and clone the code
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:34 AM, gmspro wrote:
>
> No,
> I can download as .tar.bz2, but i'm talking about using git.
> git clone, git add ., git commit -a, git push is easier to keep track of
> my code. Then for git pull request.
Mercurial can do all that. I'm not as familiar with it as I am wi
No,
I can download as .tar.bz2, but i'm talking about using git.
git clone, git add ., git commit -a, git push is easier to keep track of my
code. Then for git pull request.
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, George Silva wrote:
From: George Silva
Subject: Re: Why is python source code not availab
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:16 AM, gmspro wrote:
>
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
It's done with Mercurial, not git, but the same can be done:
hg clone http://hg.python
On 6/23/2012 7:16 PM, gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
If you mean CPython, it's because the devs use Mercurial and have their
own hosting on python.org.
hg clone http://hg.python.org/cpython
http://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html
github is far from
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.3/Python-2.7.3.tar.bz2
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
>
> --
> http://mail.python
Why is python source code not available on github?
Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source code.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"Stephen Hansen" wrote in message
news:mailman.2344.1277821469.32709.python-l...@python.org...
> On 6/29/10 12:27 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> In message<4c286d71$0$18654$4fafb...@reader3.news.tin.it>, superpollo
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro ha scritto:
Is it really such a
On 6/29/10 12:27 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message<4c286d71$0$18654$4fafb...@reader3.news.tin.it>, superpollo
wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro ha scritto:
Is it really such a hassle to install things on Windows?
no, but it *IS* to explain it to dumb users... :-(
Can’t you create an inst
In message <4c286d71$0$18654$4fafb...@reader3.news.tin.it>, superpollo
wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro ha scritto:
>>
>> Is it really such a hassle to install things on Windows?
>
> no, but it *IS* to explain it to dumb users... :-(
Can’t you create an installation package that specifies Python a
Lawrence D'Oliveiro ha scritto:
In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
wrote:
suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
"testers" are windows users and don't want to go
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
> wrote:
>
>> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
>> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
>> "testers"
On 2010-06-28, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
> wrote:
>
>> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
>> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
>> "testers" are windows user
In message <4c24c152$0$31381$4fafb...@reader1.news.tin.it>, superpollo
wrote:
> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
> "testers" are windows users and don't want to go through the hassle of
> inst
On 2010-06-25, superpollo wrote:
> suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
> win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
> "testers" are windows users and don't want to go through the hassle
> of installing python on their win boxes). what is t
hi.
suppose i work in a linux environment, but i would like to ship a
win/dos executable file from time to time, just for test purposes (my
"testers" are windows users and don't want to go through the hassle of
installing python on their win boxes). what is the best way to do that?
(the appli
I developed a source code search engine for python (http://
nullege.com). It helps you find samples from open source projects.
Unlike other code search engines, it really understands python syntax
and generates more relative results.
I'm working on expend the source code collection now. Give it a t
On Sep 20, 8:19 am, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
> in a large projects. There are package code, testing code. I'm
> wondering if there has been any summary on previous practices.
>
(Sorry for the late reply.)
My adv
On 20 Sep., 22:10, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 07:10 pm, pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
> > wrote:
> >>>I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
> >>>in a large proj
On 07:10 pm, pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
wrote:
I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
in a large projects. There are package code, testing code. I'm
wondering if there has been any summary on previous prac
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
wrote:
>> I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
>> in a large projects. There are package code, testing code. I'm
>> wondering if there has been any summary on previous practices.
>
> I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
> in a large projects. There are package code, testing code. I'm
> wondering if there has been any summary on previous practices.
I suggest looking at the source code of large projects like twisted,
PIL, djan
Hi,
I am wondering what is the best way of organizing python source code
in a large projects. There are package code, testing code. I'm
wondering if there has been any summary on previous practices.
Regards,
Peng
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Seberino writes with great flourish:
>
> I'd like to build a lexer aka lexical analyzer aka tokenizer for
> Python source code as a learning exercise.
>
> Where can I find the regexs that define the tokens of Python source?
> (I am aware of tokenizer.py but I was
I'd like to build a lexer aka lexical analyzer aka tokenizer for
Python source code as a learning exercise.
Where can I find the regexs that define the tokens of Python source?
(I am aware of tokenizer.py but I was hoping there was a web page w/ a
list somewhere.)
cs
--
http://mail.pytho
Qauzzix wrote:
Greetings.
Since I have been using dia to make my UML diagrams. I also found an
util named dia2code that generates python code from dia diagram. Now
that I have that option I really want to find a way to generate dia
diagram from existing code and/or maintain my diagrams.
I have
On Jul 25, 8:31 am, "Gabriel Genellina"
wrote:
> En Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:52:47 -0300, Qauzzix escribió:
>
> > Since I have been usingdiato make my UML diagrams. I also found an
> > util named dia2code that generates python code fromdiadiagram. Now
> > that I have that option I really want to find
En Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:52:47 -0300, Qauzzix escribió:
Since I have been using dia to make my UML diagrams. I also found an
util named dia2code that generates python code from dia diagram. Now
that I have that option I really want to find a way to generate dia
diagram from existing code and/or m
Greetings.
Since I have been using dia to make my UML diagrams. I also found an
util named dia2code that generates python code from dia diagram. Now
that I have that option I really want to find a way to generate dia
diagram from existing code and/or maintain my diagrams.
I have been googling li
xkenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll shortly be distributing a number of python applications that
> use proprietary.
That's unfortunate. Hopefully it's not too late to avoid restricting
yourself and your users in this way.
> The software is part of a much larger system and it will need to
xkenneth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'll shortly be distributing a number of python applications that
> use proprietary. The software is part of a much larger system and it
> will need to be distributed securely. How can i achieve this?
>
> Regards,
> Ken
We have partnered with developers to use
xkenneth wrote:
> Message should have read:
> Hi All,
>
> I'll shortly be distributing a number of python applications that
> use proprietary source code. The software is part of a much larger
> system and it
> will need to be distributed securely. How can i achieve this?
You need to define
So for example one could:
1. Put all the compiled Python bytecode in an encrypted binary file.
2. Build a small binary executable (.exe file) that:
2a. Reads the binary file.
2b. Decrypts it to conventional Python byte code.
2c. Embeds a Python interpreter.
2d. Executes the byte
the application as a web service there is no need to
distribute anything all. That is what Google does.
You don't have to distribute your Python source code. You can
distribute Python bytecode (.pyc files).
Python bytecode can be decompiled, but the source can not be
retrieved. The same
Message should have read:
Hi All,
I'll shortly be distributing a number of python applications that
use proprietary source code. The software is part of a much larger
system and it
will need to be distributed securely. How can i achieve this?
Regards,
Ken
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
Hi All,
I'll shortly be distributing a number of python applications that
use proprietary. The software is part of a much larger system and it
will need to be distributed securely. How can i achieve this?
Regards,
Ken
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> I am trying to build python from scratch under VC8. The build process
> runs and completes succesfully in debug mode resulting in
> python_d.exe. But when i try to run this exe it returns an assertion
> error and application crashes.
What Python version are you trying to compile? This sounds li
Hello everyone,
I am trying to build python from scratch under VC8. The build process
runs and completes succesfully in debug mode resulting in
python_d.exe. But when i try to run this exe it returns an assertion
error and application crashes.
Has anyone successfully build python using VC8. Your
On 9/9/07, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > tokenize.tokenize(
> > file.readline,
> > processStrings
> > )
> >
> > How would you go about writing the output to a file? I mean, I would
> > like to open the file at main level and pass a handle to the file to
> > processStrings to writ
eck literal
> strings entered into Python source code? I don't mean spell-check
> strings entered by the user; I mean, go through the .py file, isolate
> strings, and tell me when the strings contain misspelled words. In an
> ideal world, my IDE would do this with a red wavy line.
> tokenize.tokenize(
> file.readline,
> processStrings
> )
>
> How would you go about writing the output to a file? I mean, I would
> like to open the file at main level and pass a handle to the file to
> processStrings to write to it, finally close output file at main level.
> Probably
>> In an ideal world, my IDE would do this with a red wavy line.
>
> You didn't mention which IDE you use; however, if you use Emacs, there
> is flyspell-prog-mode which does that for you (checks your spelling
> "on the fly", but only within comments and strings).
Same in Vim (:set spell)
HTH,
--
John Zenger writes:
> In an ideal world, my IDE would do this with a red wavy line.
You didn't mention which IDE you use; however, if you use Emacs, there
is flyspell-prog-mode which does that for you (checks your spelling
"on the fly", but only within comments and strings).
Regards,
David Trudg
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:04:55 -0700, John Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In an ideal world, my IDE would do this with a red wavy line.
I can't help with your problem, but this is the first thing I turn off in
Word. It drives me _mad_.
Sorry - just had to share that.
DaveM
--
http://mail.p
David wrote:
>>> (I know that the better practice is to isolate user-displayed strings
>>> from the code, but in this case that just didn't happen.)
>>>
>> Use the re module, identify the strings and write them to another file,
>> then open the file with your spell checker. Program shouldn't be mor
> >
> > (I know that the better practice is to isolate user-displayed strings
> > from the code, but in this case that just didn't happen.)
> >
>
> Use the re module, identify the strings and write them to another file,
> then open the file with your spell checker. Program shouldn't be more
> than
John Zenger wrote:
> To my horror, someone pointed out to me yesterday that a web app I
> wrote has been prominently displaying a misspelled word. The word was
> buried in my code.
>
> Is there a utility out there that will help spell-check literal
> strings entered into Pyth
To my horror, someone pointed out to me yesterday that a web app I
wrote has been prominently displaying a misspelled word. The word was
buried in my code.
Is there a utility out there that will help spell-check literal
strings entered into Python source code? I don't mean spell-check
st
En Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:13:23 -0300, Alan Franzoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> this
> container does create a copy of the object even employing incremental
> operators.
>
> Now, let's suppose I find that container type not useful for my purposes,
> *or* I have already written a different cont
Il Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:13:28 -0300, Gabriel Genellina ha scritto:
> __iadd__, in general, is not *required* to modify the instance in place
> (but should try to do that, if possible). After this code:
> b = a
> a += c
> you can't assert than a and b both refer to the *same* object, a
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo