RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> So you are saying that nuget-ing .Net core would be a workable pre-requisite > for > Rx on mono? Microsoft open sourced .net a while ago. With that came the movement to bring .net to other platforms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework#.NET_Core As its currently being heavily develop

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 7:47:21 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work > > in Linux/C# (ie mono)? > > Mono, I forgot what that is when .net core debuted:) A brief elaboration on that please?? ∵ … > > Looks lik

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work > in Linux/C# (ie mono)? Mono, I forgot what that is when .net core debuted:) Looks like the .net Rx guys have a port, https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/Rx.NET/issues/148 A package for .net core is up on nuget.

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> Thanks Joseph > Trouble is there is stew of technologies/languages… > (meta)-stewed with more abstract concepts, eg push vs pull, > Enumerable-Observable > duality, continuous vs discrete time > The last causing its own share of confusion with “functional reactive > programming” (FRP) meaning s

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:50:09 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > However, I have only used the .NET implementations. One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work in Linux/C# (ie mono)? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:50:09 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python > > > > I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” > > Try these links on for size: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh24

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>> There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python > > I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” Try these links on for size: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242982(v=vs.103).aspx which links to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242983(v=vs.10

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> Try these links on for size: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242982(v=vs.103).aspx which links > to > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242983(v=vs.103).aspx near the end. These two SO threads have a variation of pretty good explanations: http://stackoverflow.com/questi

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 10:21:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote: > There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python Also, addressing the same problem area, there is the slightly older reactiveX system that seems to have bindings for at least 15 mainstream languages… including python: http://reactivex.io/ Has someone been able to put these tw