"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S wrote:
>
> > I downloaded Pyrex and ran it through their own
> > example. The code looks quite messy, and I even saw a
> > few "goto"s.
>
> looked at the assembler output from your C compiler lately?
>
>
LOL! - is it even possible to c
On 2/11/2006 12:53 AM, Michael S wrote:
> I downloaded Pyrex and ran it through their own
> example. The code looks quite messy, and I even saw a
> few "goto"s.
> I think I will stick with my own code for now.
> Thanks in any case.
If your own code is doing the right amount of reference counting,
Michael S wrote:
> What if it doesn't do exactly what you need to? How do
> you debug through that code?
same way as you'd hunt for bugs in the Python-to-bytecode compiler, or
your C compiler.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What if it doesn't do exactly what you need to? How do
you debug through that code?
--- Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S wrote:
>
> > My assembler is very basic, so it wouldn't help,
> while
> > my C is OK, well sort of.
> >
> > BTW. Neither have I looked at the machine code
Michael S wrote:
> My assembler is very basic, so it wouldn't help, while
> my C is OK, well sort of.
>
> BTW. Neither have I looked at the machine code that
> the assembler produces.
so why does the output from Pyrex worry you? it's a compiler, after all.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
My assembler is very basic, so it wouldn't help, while
my C is OK, well sort of.
BTW. Neither have I looked at the machine code that
the assembler produces.
--- Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S wrote:
>
> > I downloaded Pyrex and ran it through their own
> > example. The co
Michael S wrote:
> I downloaded Pyrex and ran it through their own
> example. The code looks quite messy, and I even saw a
> few "goto"s.
looked at the assembler output from your C compiler lately?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I downloaded Pyrex and ran it through their own
example. The code looks quite messy, and I even saw a
few "goto"s.
I think I will stick with my own code for now.
Thanks in any case.
--- John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S wrote:
> > Good day all.
> >
> > I rewrote part of my progr
> BTW, why did you rewrite in C rarher than using
> Pyrex?
I was not aware of pyrex. I didn't really mind doing
some C, it made me remember the syntax.
Thanks a lot. I did think that I could pack a function
address as a parameter.
--- John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S wrote:
> >
Michael S wrote:
> Good day all.
>
> I rewrote part of my program in C, it's a usually a
> long task. I wanted to be able to report the progress
> back to my python program. In my module (in addition
> to the function that performs the above-mentioned
> task) there is a function that returns the v
Good day all.
I rewrote part of my program in C, it's a usually a
long task. I wanted to be able to report the progress
back to my python program. In my module (in addition
to the function that performs the above-mentioned
task) there is a function that returns the variable,
indicating the progre
11 matches
Mail list logo