On Thursday 08 December 2016 02:17, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Trying to write some code using sets (well frozen sets)
> And was hit by this anomaly
>
> This is the behavior of lists I analogously expect in sets:
>
[]
> []
[[]]
> [[]]
>
> ie the empty list and the list of the empty li
On 2016-12-07 15:33, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:18:32 AM UTC-5, Rustom Mody wrote:
Trying to write some code using sets (well frozen sets)
And was hit by this anomaly
This is the behavior of lists I analogously expect in sets:
>>> []
[]
>>> [[]]
[[]]
>>>
ie the
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 10:18:32 AM UTC-5, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Trying to write some code using sets (well frozen sets)
> And was hit by this anomaly
>
> This is the behavior of lists I analogously expect in sets:
>
> >>> []
> []
> >>> [[]]
> [[]]
> >>>
>
> ie the empty list and the l
Trying to write some code using sets (well frozen sets)
And was hit by this anomaly
This is the behavior of lists I analogously expect in sets:
>>> []
[]
>>> [[]]
[[]]
>>>
ie the empty list and the list of the empty list are different things
However
(with
f= frozenset
)
>>> f()
frozenset()
>>
