from smtplib import SMTP
from socket import sslerror #if desired
server = SMTP('smtp.gmail.com')
server.set_debuglevel(0) # or 1 for verbosity
server.ehlo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
server.starttls()
server.ehlo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]') # say hello again
server.login('[EMAIL PROTECTED]', 'yourpasswo
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:25:24 GMT, py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>from smtplib import SMTP
>from socket import sslerror #if desired
>server = SMTP('smtp.gmail.com')
>server.set_debuglevel(0) # or 1 for verbosity
>server.ehlo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
>server.starttls()
>server.ehlo('[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi, Jean Paul.
I read your code with interest. I wonder, does twisted also raise the socket
error or does it know
about this apparently well-known and often ignored incompatibility between the
standard and
the implementations?
Something else has occurred to me. After starting tls, all the xmitt
Hmm, my last post seems to have been redirected to /dev/null. Anyhoo.
Jean Paul, I read your code with interest. Does twisted also raise the
apparently well-known
and often ignored socket error, and do you supposed this error has something to
do with the
fact that the trailing \n.\n is encrypted?
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:48:59 GMT, py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, Jean Paul.
>
>I read your code with interest. I wonder, does twisted also raise the socket
>error or does it know
>about this apparently well-known and often ignored incompatibility between the
>standard and
>the implementations
I would love for anybody to comment on this code with regard to
redundancy/efficiency/wordiness or whatever else.
for instance, do i understand correctly that i cant have a try: else: without
an intervening except:?
-dave
stdout.write("calling smtp server...")
try:
se
On 24/01/07, py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love for anybody to comment on this code with regard to
> redundancy/efficiency/wordiness or whatever else.
> for instance, do i understand correctly that i cant have a try: else: without
> an intervening except:?
> -dave
>
> stdout.wri
On 1/24/07, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24/01/07, py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love for anybody to comment on this code with regard to
redundancy/efficiency/wordiness or whatever else.
> for instance, do i understand correctly that i cant have a try: else:
without an in
On 24/01/07, BJ Swope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/24/07, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 24/01/07, py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would love for anybody to comment on this code with regard to
> redundancy/efficiency/wordiness or whatever else.
> > > for instanc
Sweet!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
At Wednesday 24/1/2007 09:12, BJ Swope wrote:
Both examples have included the cardinal sin in smtp...
They both send the message text followed by new line dot new line.
The smtp protocol specifically mentions CRLF dot CRLF. Please
please please use \r\n.\r\n in your code...
No. The SMTP o
Excellent imput!
I learned
- no need for trailing . and i was doing it wrong anyway.
- all those extra trys were redundant.
- the trailing comma functionality in print.
- the extra ehlo is an rfc req.
Thanks all.
-dave
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
12 matches
Mail list logo
