Whether SWIG will work in a "no brainer" way or not depends on the original
code, I think. If the original code uses a very convoluted design, of
course things will get hairy. If the package uses a very clean structure,
I think you will find SWIG works out very nicely.
The intriguing things is,
It's me wrote:
"It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am playing around with SWING building a Python module using the no
brainer
example in http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html. With that first example,
Oops! Soapy fingers. "SWIG" - not "SWING".
--
It's me.
I hav
"It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am playing around with SWING building a Python module using the no
brainer
> example in http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html. With that first example,
>
Oops! Soapy fingers. "SWIG" - not "SWING".
--
It's me.
--
http:/
I am playing around with SWING building a Python module using the no brainer
example in http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html. With that first example,
/* File : example.c */
#include
double My_variable = 3.0;
int fact(int n) {
if (n <= 1) return 1;
else return n*fact(n-1);
}
int
