Catherine M Moroney wrote:
is there
some way to use getattr/setattr to access the local variables specific
to a given function?
No, because those variables don't even exist when there
isn't a call to the function in progress.
Your example suggests that, instead of local variables,
you really
On 11/21/2013 06:02 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
Catherine Moroney wrote:
If I have a class that has some member functions, and all the
functions define a local variable of the same name (but
different type), is there some way to use getattr/setattr to
access the local variables specific to a given fu
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:52:21 +, MRAB
wrote:
> If I have a class that has some member functions, and all the
functions
> define a local variable of the same name (but different type), is
there
> some way to use getattr/setattr to access the local variables
specific
> to a given function
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 6:12:10 PM UTC-5, Catherine M Moroney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I have a class that has some member functions, and all the functions
> define a local variable of the same name (but different type), is there
> some way to use getattr/setattr to access the local variable
On 21/11/2013 23:12, Catherine M Moroney wrote:
Hello,
If I have a class that has some member functions, and all the functions
define a local variable of the same name (but different type), is there
some way to use getattr/setattr to access the local variables specific
to a given function?
Obvi
Hello,
If I have a class that has some member functions, and all the functions
define a local variable of the same name (but different type), is there
some way to use getattr/setattr to access the local variables specific
to a given function?
Obviously there's no need to do this for the small
