On Jan 17, 3:52 pm, Vito De Tullio wrote:
> Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
> >> > So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
> >> I don't know this vb2py, but you can do a 2 pass conversion
> >> [vb] -> (vb2py) -> [py2] -> (2to3) -> [py3]
> > ...and presumibly get something which do
Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
>> > So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
>> I don't know this vb2py, but you can do a 2 pass conversion
>> [vb] -> (vb2py) -> [py2] -> (2to3) -> [py3]
> ...and presumibly get something which doesn't work at all. =)
why?
AFAIK there aren't probl
On 17 Gen, 11:05, Vito De Tullio wrote:
> axtens wrote:
> > So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
>
> I don't know this vb2py, but you can do a 2 pass conversion
>
> [vb] -> (vb2py) -> [py2] -> (2to3) -> [py3]
>
> --
> By ZeD
...and presumibly get something which doesn't
axtens wrote:
> So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
I don't know this vb2py, but you can do a 2 pass conversion
[vb] -> (vb2py) -> [py2] -> (2to3) -> [py3]
--
By ZeD
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
G'day everyone
So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
Kind regards,
Bruce.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 16, 3:17 pm, axtens wrote:
> So is vb2py dead? If not, any idea when it'll support python 3?
You're always better off asking at the project site than here, but
given it hasn't been updated since Feb 2004 I think it's safe to say
the project is dead.
But it *is* open source, so feel free t
