Ok, so I found out that even though mylist[] and all objects in it were
fine ie id(mylist[i]) != id(mylist[all others]) what was happening is
that during a reproduction function a shallow copies were being made
making all offspring (genetic algorithm) have different
id(mylist[0..n]), however the
Ok, so I found out that even though mylist[] and all objects in it were
fine ie id(mylist[i]) != id(mylist[all others]) what was happening is
that during a reproduction function a shallow copies were being made
making all offspring (genetic algorithm) have different
id(mylist[0..n]), however the
Ok, so I found out that even though mylist[] and all objects in it were
fine ie id(mylist[i]) != id(mylist[all others]) what was happening is
that during a reproduction function a shallow copies were being made
making all offspring (genetic algorithm) have different
id(mylist[0..n]), however the
Ok, so I found out that even though mylist[] and all objects in it were
fine ie id(mylist[i]) != id(mylist[all others]) what was happening is
that during a reproduction function a shallow copies were being made
making all offspring (genetic algorithm) have different
id(mylist[0..n]), however the
Ok, so I found out that even though mylist[] and all objects in it were
fine ie id(mylist[i]) != id(mylist[all others]) what was happening is
that during a reproduction function a shallow copies were being made
making all offspring (genetic algorithm) have different
id(mylist[0..n]), however the
John Zenger wrote:
Your list probably contains several references to the same object,
instead of several different objects. This happens often when you use a
technique like:
list = [ object ] * 100
..because although this does make copies when object is an integer, it
just makes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
The Problem (very basic, but strange):
I have a list holding a population of objects, each object has 5 vars
and appropriate funtions to get or modify the vars.
Which are probably not necessary:
http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
(in short:
The Problem (very basic, but strange):
I have a list holding a population of objects, each object has 5 vars
and appropriate funtions to get or modify the vars. When objects in
the list have identical vars (like all = 5 for var a and all = 10 for
var b across all vars and objects) and i change
Your list probably contains several references to the same object,
instead of several different objects. This happens often when you use a
technique like:
list = [ object ] * 100
..because although this does make copies when object is an integer, it
just makes references in other cases.
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:18:12 -0400, John Zenger wrote:
Your list probably contains several references to the same object,
instead of several different objects. This happens often when you use a
technique like:
list = [ object ] * 100
..because although this does make copies when
John Zenger wrote:
Your list probably contains several references to the same object,
instead of several different objects. This happens often when you use a
technique like:
list = [ object ] * 100
This is most likely what's going on. To the OP: please post the
relevant code, including how
11 matches
Mail list logo
