Steve Holden wrote:
> Don't worry. It's sometimes difficult for the effbot to remember we
> aren't all as fearsomely intelligent as it is. I think it does a
> remarkably complete emulation of a human being:
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/152495923/
>
> For what it's wort
John Salerno wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>>JohnJSal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That's a perfectly valid comment, but in this case just not applicable.
>>>I spent a lot of time working through my original question before
>>>posting, but I just couldn't get it.
>>
>>how do you fit "a lot of time" into 18 m
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> JohnJSal wrote:
>
>> That's a perfectly valid comment, but in this case just not applicable.
>> I spent a lot of time working through my original question before
>> posting, but I just couldn't get it.
>
> how do you fit "a lot of time" into 18 minutes?
>
>
>
Hmmm, I ha
JohnJSal wrote:
> That's a perfectly valid comment, but in this case just not applicable.
> I spent a lot of time working through my original question before
> posting, but I just couldn't get it.
how do you fit "a lot of time" into 18 minutes?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
Carsten Haese wrote:
> The fact that you were able to answer your own question only a few
> minutes later indicates to me that you should set your "I give up and
> ask the list" threshold a tad higher.
That's a perfectly valid comment, but in this case just not applicable.
I spent a lot of time w
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 13:14 -0800, JohnJSal wrote:
> JohnJSal wrote:
> > JohnJSal wrote:
> > > Peter Otten wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > ...the above is not a 1-tuple, but an ordinary string. You forgot the
> > > > trailing comma:
> > > >
> > > > ('notes',)
> > >
> > > Right you are! Now it works! :)
JohnJSal wrote:
> JohnJSal wrote:
> > Peter Otten wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ...the above is not a 1-tuple, but an ordinary string. You forgot the
> > > trailing comma:
> > >
> > > ('notes',)
> >
> > Right you are! Now it works! :)
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Oh great, now I've moved on to another issue. It see
JohnJSal wrote:
> JohnJSal wrote:
> > Peter Otten wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ...the above is not a 1-tuple, but an ordinary string. You forgot the
> > > trailing comma:
> > >
> > > ('notes',)
> >
> > Right you are! Now it works! :)
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Oh great, now I've moved on to another issue. It see
JohnJSal wrote:
> Peter Otten wrote:
>
>
> > ...the above is not a 1-tuple, but an ordinary string. You forgot the
> > trailing comma:
> >
> > ('notes',)
>
> Right you are! Now it works! :)
>
> Thanks!
Oh great, now I've moved on to another issue. It seems that the list
appending isn't working rig
Peter Otten wrote:
> ...the above is not a 1-tuple, but an ordinary string. You forgot the
> trailing comma:
>
> ('notes',)
Right you are! Now it works! :)
Thanks!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
JohnJSal wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why the first version of this method works,
> but the second one doesn't? All I've changed (I think) is how the
> information is nested. The error I'm getting is that the call to
> xrc.XRCCTRL is not working in the second example. Instead of getting
> th
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 12:28 -0800, JohnJSal wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why the first version of this method works,
> but the second one doesn't? All I've changed (I think) is how the
> information is nested. The error I'm getting is that the call to
> xrc.XRCCTRL is not working in the secon
JohnJSal wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why the first version of this method works,
> but the second one doesn't?
Sorry, it's the first one that doesn't work. The second one does.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Can someone explain to me why the first version of this method works,
but the second one doesn't? All I've changed (I think) is how the
information is nested. The error I'm getting is that the call to
xrc.XRCCTRL is not working in the second example. Instead of getting
the appropriate widget, it's
14 matches
Mail list logo
