Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:24:30 -0300, Scott David Daniels
...
OK, you have a mix of Python 3,0 and current (2.5.1) Python.
All examples are OK for 2.5
You are absolutely correct. Sorry for the misinformation. I've been
working on 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, and trying 3.0
On Oct 20, 3:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
print b if ((b a) and (b (a * b))) else a
Everyone else has already pointed out that you need 2.5. As a matter
of style, the above line can be written more cleanly:
print b if a b a * b else a
--
Paul Hankin
--
hi
I'm following the python's translation of SICP:
http://codepoetics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Topics:SICP_in_other_languages:Python:Chapter_1
...
a = 3
b = a + 1
print a + b + (a * b)
print (a == b)
print b if ((b a) and (b (a * b))) else a
everything was fine till this point, and I got:
Tab is not the issue here. By my powers of deduction, I can see that
you are running this code in Python version previous to 2.5, because
the construct true_clause if condition else false_clause did not
exist until 2.5. It's a neat little construct, I highly recommend you
upgrade now :)
En Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:24:30 -0300, Scott David Daniels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm following the python's translation of SICP:
http://codepoetics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Topics:SICP_in_other_languages:Python:Chapter_1
...
OK, you have a mix of Python 3,0 and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm following the python's translation of SICP:
http://codepoetics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Topics:SICP_in_other_languages:Python:Chapter_1
...
OK, you have a mix of Python 3,0 and current (2.5.1) Python.
a = 3
b = a + 1
Fine in all
print a + b + (a * b)
Fine in all
