"cool" is in the eyes of the beholder.
While I agree that this can be useful in some situations, I find it
very annoying when all I want (and need) to do is a simple dumber
search and yet it tells me tons of useless searches that I don't care
for.
The inability to debug multi-threaded application
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> I have both, but the IDE I use every day is SPE, which is shareware. I'm
> not savvy enough to enumerate a feature comparison, but I do find SPE
> extremely friendly and intuitive.
>
> Gerry
SPE is not shareware. It is open-source, gpl-licensed freeware.
Donations ho
Karlo Lozovina wrote:
> "vj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:1162708898.962171.161120
> @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
>
> > The embedded python shell is also a useful feature.
>
> Yes, but Debug Probe and Stack Data absolutely rock! Can't live without
> them anymore. Just set a breakpoint, run yo
"vj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:1162708898.962171.161120
@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
> The embedded python shell is also a useful feature.
Yes, but Debug Probe and Stack Data absolutely rock! Can't live without
them anymore. Just set a breakpoint, run your code end then you can
inspect
Forgot to mention WING's file search and replace is pretty cool and
powerful. It keeps checking changes in a different thread. If you want
to change yyy in say 100 files you would:
1. specify yyy in the search window
2. A list of files get displayed with matching yyy
3. As you fix replace yyy in t
vj wrote:
> I've tried both and find WingIDE much faster than Komodo and the layout
> is very well thought out. I love the way you can collapse all the
> differnet panes with a few keystrokes. I also like their autocomplete
> functionality.
>
+1
I use Wing and enjoy its auto-completion.
Fuzzyma
I've tried both and find WingIDE much faster than Komodo and the layout
is very well thought out. I love the way you can collapse all the
differnet panes with a few keystrokes. I also like their autocomplete
functionality.
Wing is developed by a small company, focussed on python development,
while
I have both, but the IDE I use every day is SPE, which is shareware. I'm
not savvy enough to enumerate a feature comparison, but I do find SPE
extremely friendly and intuitive.
Gerry
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 13 Oct 2006 17:07:56 -0700, Sandra-24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Salerno wrote:
> > Just curious what users of the two big commercial IDEs think of them
> > compared to one another (if you've used both).
> >
> > Wing IDE looks a lot nicer and fuller featured in the screenshots, but a
> >
Paul Boddie wrote:
> hg wrote:
> >
> > Eric3 is very nice and moving forward ... I believe it is based on the
> > QT library which free ... yet not so free under windows (i have yet to
> > understand the business model).
>
> There are snapshots of Eric4 available, apparently. See here for more:
>
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
> Paul Boddie wrote:
> > hg wrote:
> >> PS: I also was taken aback by the fact that the PyDev license was
> >> "per-year" ... it's like buying Word for a year only ... isn't it ?
> >
> > Flashbacks to the age of shareware seem to be commonplace in the realm
> > of Eclipse, or
Paul Boddie wrote:
> hg wrote:
>> PS: I also was taken aback by the fact that the PyDev license was
>> "per-year" ... it's like buying Word for a year only ... isn't it ?
>
> Flashbacks to the age of shareware seem to be commonplace in the realm
> of Eclipse, or that's how the scene seems to me.
> "Eric is becoming an integral part of our Python development here at
> Fluent. It's ability to set and trigger breakpoints in any thread is
> unlike any other Python debugger we have tried. Through Eric's easy to
> use interface and tight integration with PyQt, it has helped reduce
> our debuggin
> "Eric is becoming an integral part of our Python development here at
> Fluent. It's ability to set and trigger breakpoints in any thread is
> unlike any other Python debugger we have tried. Through Eric's easy to
> use interface and tight integration with PyQt, it has helped reduce
> our debuggin
John Salerno wrote:
> Just curious what users of the two big commercial IDEs think of them
> compared to one another (if you've used both).
>
> Wing IDE looks a lot nicer and fuller featured in the screenshots, but a
> glance at the feature list shows that the "personal" version doesn't
> even
John Salerno wrote:
> Just curious what users of the two big commercial IDEs think of them
> compared to one another (if you've used both).
>
> Wing IDE looks a lot nicer and fuller featured in the screenshots, but a
> glance at the feature list shows that the "personal" version doesn't
> even supp
hg wrote:
>
> Eric3 is very nice and moving forward ... I believe it is based on the
> QT library which free ... yet not so free under windows (i have yet to
> understand the business model).
There are snapshots of Eric4 available, apparently. See here for more:
http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.u
Todd Whiteman wrote:
> Check the following links, somebody has already done the hard work for
> you :)
>
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/IntegratedDevelopmentEnvironments
> http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html
> http://spyced.blogspot.com/2005/09/review-of-6-python-ides.h
Check the following links, somebody has already done the hard work for
you :)
http://wiki.python.org/moin/IntegratedDevelopmentEnvironments
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2005/09/review-of-6-python-ides.html
http://www.straw-dogs.co.uk/b
On 10/13/06, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Eric available for Windows? I have found the install files before,
> but they looked like it was for Linux.
You need QScintilla IIRC, but:
http://www.die-offenbachs.de/detlev/eric3-testimonials.html
"Eric is becoming an integral part of
Theerasak Photha wrote:
> On 10/13/06, hg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have spend the past two years with eclipse/pydev ... a few issue are
>> still troublesome to me (speed, search for definitions ... being a few
>> of them) ... and until two days ago I had not even looked at Wing as I
>> wr
Theerasak Photha wrote:
> On 10/13/06, hg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have spend the past two years with eclipse/pydev ... a few issue are
>> still troublesome to me (speed, search for definitions ... being a few
>> of them) ... and until two days ago I had not even looked at Wing as I
>> wr
On 10/13/06, hg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have spend the past two years with eclipse/pydev ... a few issue are
> still troublesome to me (speed, search for definitions ... being a few
> of them) ... and until two days ago I had not even looked at Wing as I
> wrongly thought it was on Windoze-
Theerasak Photha wrote:
> On 10/13/06, hg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm really interested: my *small* company is ready to spend the ~300$ in
>> the process, but Komodo looks _very_ sparse.
>>
>> How do you go about it? ... I have resources to look at it for one or
>> two days.
>
> It's enti
On 10/13/06, hg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm really interested: my *small* company is ready to spend the ~300$ in
> the process, but Komodo looks _very_ sparse.
>
> How do you go about it? ... I have resources to look at it for one or
> two days.
It's entirely possible you could use a free ID
Theerasak Photha wrote:
> On 10/13/06, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Komodo, on the other hand, seems to have more of the features that the
>> personal version of Wing IDE lacks (call tips, class browser, etc.) but
>> the look of it seems very sparse for some reason.
>
> But that's
Theerasak Photha wrote:
> On 10/13/06, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Komodo, on the other hand, seems to have more of the features that the
>> personal version of Wing IDE lacks (call tips, class browser, etc.) but
>> the look of it seems very sparse for some reason.
>
> But that's
On 10/13/06, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Komodo, on the other hand, seems to have more of the features that the
> personal version of Wing IDE lacks (call tips, class browser, etc.) but
> the look of it seems very sparse for some reason.
But that's really a good thing.
-- Theerasak
John Salerno wrote:
> Just curious what users of the two big commercial IDEs think of them
> compared to one another (if you've used both).
>
> Wing IDE looks a lot nicer and fuller featured in the screenshots, but a
> glance at the feature list shows that the "personal" version doesn't
> even sup
Just curious what users of the two big commercial IDEs think of them
compared to one another (if you've used both).
Wing IDE looks a lot nicer and fuller featured in the screenshots, but a
glance at the feature list shows that the "personal" version doesn't
even support code folding! That's a l
30 matches
Mail list logo
