Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 03.08.2011 04:15 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
[...]
> > but to me that looks badly wrong. Surely the spam context manager
> > object will exit after the first iteration, and always raise an
> > exception on the second? But I don't quite understand context
> > managers eno
Am 03.08.2011 04:15 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
> I'm not greatly experienced with context managers and the with
> statement, so I would like to check my logic.
>
> Somebody (doesn't matter who, or where) stated that they frequently
> use this idiom:
>
> spam = MyContextManager(*args)
> for ham in m
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:15:44 +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm not greatly experienced with context managers and the with statement, so
> I would like to check my logic.
>
> Somebody (doesn't matter who, or where) stated that they frequently use this
> idiom:
>
> spam = MyContextManager(*args)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I'm not greatly experienced with context managers and the with statement, so
> I would like to check my logic.
>
> Somebody (doesn't matter who, or where) stated that they frequently use this
> idiom:
>
> spam = MyContextManager(*args)
> fo
I'm not greatly experienced with context managers and the with statement, so
I would like to check my logic.
Somebody (doesn't matter who, or where) stated that they frequently use this
idiom:
spam = MyContextManager(*args)
for ham in my_iter:
with spam:
# do stuff
but to me that l
