On 29/09/2012 04:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:25:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Mine is simpler and faster.
r = re.compile()
The OP doesn't say that you have to compile it, so just:
''
wins.
My understanding is that Python 3.3 has regressed the performance of ''.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
My understanding is that Python 3.3 has regressed the performance of ''.
Surely the Python devs can speed the performance back up and, just for us,
use less memory at the same time?
Yes, but to do that we'd have to
On 29/09/2012 11:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
My understanding is that Python 3.3 has regressed the performance of ''.
Surely the Python devs can speed the performance back up and, just for us,
use less memory at the
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
My understanding is that Python 3.3 has regressed the performance of ''.
Surely the Python devs can speed the performance back up and, just for us,
use less memory at the same time?
At least it will be stored as a
On 29 September 2012 20:05, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
My understanding is that Python 3.3 has regressed the performance of ''.
Surely the Python devs can speed the performance back up and, just for
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tim Delaney
timothy.c.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I voted for the Fierce Snake[1][2] as the delimiter, but it was
voted down as not Pythonic enough.
I'm sure they were using that as a euphamism for Python*ish* though.
[1]
On 30 September 2012 09:26, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tim Delaney
timothy.c.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I voted for the Fierce Snake[1][2] as the delimiter, but it
was
voted down as not Pythonic enough.
I'm sure they were using that
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
-tkc
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
iMath redstone-c...@163.com writes:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
And then you have two problems.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
-tkc
What's the run time speed like? How much memory does it use? Shouldn't
you
On 09/28/12 20:58, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy. Thanks for the challenge :-)
What's the run time speed like?
O(1)
r
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
On 09/28/12 20:58, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 29/09/2012 02:35, Tim Chase wrote:
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
Okay, that was pretty easy
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:25:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Mine is simpler and faster.
r = re.compile()
The OP doesn't say that you have to compile it, so just:
''
wins.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 09/28/12 22:25, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Tim Chase
On 09/28/12 19:31, iMath wrote:
write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800) 555-1212.
r = re.compile(
800-555-1212|
555-1212|
r\(800\) 555-1212
)
Mine is simpler and faster
On 09/28/12 22:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:25:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Mine is simpler and faster.
r = re.compile()
The OP doesn't say that you have to compile it, so just:
''
wins.
OP doesn't say it even has to be a string, so I guess
wins. :-P
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
What's the run time speed like? How much memory does it use? Shouldn't you
be using the regex module from pypi instead of the standard library re?
Guess who's borrowed the time machine?
O(n), O(1), and I used RE2.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com
To: Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com
Cc: Python python-list@python.org
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: write a regex matches 800-555-1212, 555-1212, and also (800)
555-1212.
On 09/28/12 22:25
18 matches
Mail list logo
