Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python list
implementation:-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
That problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we use
'+=' and '+' '=' operators separately.
For example-
Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
import openpyxl
book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
i = 2
x = []
y = []while i < 10:
keys = sheet.cell(row=i,column
Thuruv V wrote:
> Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
Try it at the interactive interpreter:
py> zip('abc', [1, 2, 3]) # works fine
[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3)]
But:
py> zip(1000, [1, 2, 3]) # fails
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, i
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have faced regarding python
list implementation :-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
The problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
use ‘+=’ and ‘+’ ‘=’ operators separately.
For example-
PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
> Hello
>
> I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python
> list implementation:-
>
> As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
>
> That problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
> use '+='
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>
Py3's byte strings are still strings, though.
>>>
>>> Hm. I don't think so. In a plain English sense, maybe, but that kind of
>>> usage can lead to confusion.
>>
>> Only if you are determined to confuse yourself.
>>
>>
On 25/11/2014 11:40, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python
list implementation:-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
That problem I found with the list is that is behaves
On 25/11/2014 11:44, Archana Pandey wrote:
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have faced regarding python
list implementation :-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
The problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
use ‘+=’ and ‘
On 11/25/2014 04:23 AM, PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
Hello
Welcome. This is apparently your first post, or at least first for
quite a while.
Note that this is a text forum (usenet, mailing list), and doesn't
properly support either html messages nor attachments. Just tell your
mailer
All,
We've gone through the grunt work of researching and integrating
XMLDSIG, XAdES and UBL schemas and its various extensions and
dependencies and wrote a bunch of scripts that map these documents to
python objects.
UBL stands for Universal Business Language. It's an OASIS standard that
defines
On 21/11/2014 07:52, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
sohcahto...@gmail.com:
>My point was that I was making fun of CS professors that demand a
>comment on every line of code, regardless of how clear the line of
>code is.
Unfortunately, a lot of software houses do a similar thing. Not quite
every line, b
Marco Buttu :
> To acknowledge the OP, the statistics module deserves to be taken as
> example for writing good comments and docstrings:
>
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.4/Lib/statistics.py
True, it is done with good style. It concentrates on documenting use and
lets the implementation do
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I think this conversation is going nowhere, so it's probably best to end it.
\0
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:20:26 +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> a=[1,2,3]
binds a to the list [1,2,3]
> b=a
binds b to a
> b+=[4,5]
Changes existing b, which is also a
> x=[1,2,3]
binds x to the list [1,2,3]
> y=x
binds y to x
> y=y+[4,5]
Binds y to a new list which comprises previous y plus
Thanks for the hint , I was able to get the error messages on the console
by setting the StreamHandler level to WARNING .
It works for me know butone LAST question , it might sound simple,
but Iam not able to understand the difference between
- (a) ch.setLevel(logging.WARNING) and c
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 11:56:31 PM Michael Torrie wrote:
Looks alright. Does it work?
Well, no =/
First I had to remove the multiple inheritance, because Qt doesn't allow
that, so I removed the QObject.
Second, just for testing I'm calling the module directly using:
timer = QTimer()
timer.start
On Monday, November 24, 2014 10:26:42 AM UTC-6, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Benjamin Risher :
>
> > I was wondering if you ever made progress with your asyncio project.
> > I'm currently digging around for examples and reference material and
> > came across your post.
> >
> > I'd be interested in any
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Marco Buttu :
>
>> To acknowledge the OP, the statistics module deserves to be taken as
>> example for writing good comments and docstrings:
>>
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.4/Lib/statistics.py
>
> True, it is done with good style. It concentrates on documenting
Archana Pandey wrote:
[...]
> A = a + 1 and a += 1 both behave in same way for all data types except
> python Lists
I cannot think of any other mutable data type that supports + but there are
mutable data types that support other augmented assignment operators:
py> a = set("abcd")
py> b = a #
Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Thanks for the hint , I was able to get the error messages on the console
> by setting the StreamHandler level to WARNING .
>
> It works for me know butone LAST question , it might sound simple,
> but Iam not able to understand the difference between
>
> - (a) ch
On 2014-11-25 13:58, Juan Christian wrote:
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 11:56:31 PM Michael Torrie mailto:torr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Looks alright. Does it work?
Well, no =/
First I had to remove the multiple inheritance, because Qt doesn't allow
that, so I removed the QObject.
Second, just for testi
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 1:42:24 PM MRAB wrote:
I think that the problem there is that strings don't have an __exit__
method.
I don't understand what you said, what you mean by that? =/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In view of next edition of the Eric IDE Technical Report (forecast: 3rd
quarter '15) we'll welcome
your testimony of experiences and use of specific Eric IDE's features, such as:
– Special features of your choice, such as: SQL Browser, Qt Forms Designer,
Debug Remote Configurable,
Eric API
In Thuruv V
writes:
> Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
> import openpyxl
> book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
> sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
> cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
> i = 2
> x = []
> y = []while i
On 11/25/2014 04:34 AM, Thuruv V wrote:
Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
import openpyxl
book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
i = 2
x = []
y = []while
On 2014-11-25 15:48, Juan Christian wrote:
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 1:42:24 PM MRAB mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote:
I think that the problem there is that strings don't have an __exit__
method.
I don't understand what you said, what you mean by that? =/
The traceback says:
Traceback (
п'ятниця, 21-лис-2014 08:15:57 ви написали:
This looks very good indeed. As a matter of interest, is there any
particular reason you have used 2*b instead of b+b? Might b+b be faster
than b*2?
Yes, it is slightly faster, but the effect is indiscernible in total
time. But
there is not harm to
So I have a python module that I have written which uses CFFI to link against a C library I have compiled. Specifically, it is a Database driver for the 4th dimension database, using an open-source C library distributed by the 4D company. I have tested the module and C code on a couple of different
Hi folks.
I must be doing something wrong, but I (and the clever folks at the #python
channel) can't figure what.
I'm doing a:
python setup.py register -r pypitest
And getting the following in return
running register
running egg_info
writing Appengine_Fixture_Loader.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing t
So guys, I had to change to approach, I read that using Qt I can't do
multiple inheritance. So my Outpost class can't be like 'Outpost(QObject,
QThred)'. I had to change the code a bit:
from PySide.QtCore import QObject, QThread, Signal
import requests
import bs4
class Worker(QThread):
def __ini
A problem for your consideration:
We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment text,
possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\), ('\\', '\n')
...)
These may be nested.
Here's the problem: Determine
On 2014-11-25 18:18, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A problem for your consideration:
>
> We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment
> text, possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
>
> delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\),
> ('\\', '\n') ...)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A problem for your consideration:
>
> We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment text,
> possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
>
> delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\), ('\\', '
On 11/25/2014 02:31 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
п'ятниця, 21-лис-2014 08:15:57 ви написали:
This looks very good indeed. As a matter of interest, is there any
particular reason you have used 2*b instead of b+b? Might b+b be faster
than b*2?
Yes, it is slightly faster, but the effect is indisce
Juan Christian wrote:
> OFF-TOPIC: You guys said that my emails had some trash HTML and strange
> stuffs, is it OK now?
You're still sending:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative
Please configure your MUA to send
Content-Type: text/plain
only.
--
Christoph M. Becker
--
https://mail.pyt
On 11/25/2014 06:44 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
You may have issues with your definition of nesting, though. For
instance, what's it mean if you have double-quotes, then a hash?
It means that the hash is quoted as part of the literal string.
then the only nesting you need worry about is /* and
On 11/25/2014 06:40 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-11-25 18:18, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
A problem for your consideration:
We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment
text, possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'),
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> And what should happen with mismatched quotes?
>>
>>do("th/*is", "and", "th*/at")
>
>
> Match pairs as usual, and let the remaining unterminated quote run on.
Wait, what? Where's an unterminated quote? I can imagine two ways of
reading
On 2014-11-25 19:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> > hen you find any opener, you seek its
> corresponding closer, and then special-case /* to count any
> additional /* and look for a */ for each one */ .
>
> That's more or less where I was headed. I just wanted something
> less brute force :)
This se
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> Here's the problem: Determine is the string S appears *outside* or
> *inside* any such quotation.
This is a problem for parsing text. There is no general, simple
solution.
If someone tries to convince you they have one, be highly suspicious: it
will either be not general,
On 11/25/2014 02:36 PM, Juan Christian wrote:
> So guys, I had to change to approach, I read that using Qt I can't do
> multiple inheritance. So my Outpost class can't be like 'Outpost(QObject,
> QThred)'. I had to change the code a bit:
>
> So, let's see the problems:
>
> Traceback (most recent
On 11/25/2014 07:32 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
And what should happen with mismatched quotes?
do("th/*is", "and", "th*/at")
Match pairs as usual, and let the remaining unterminated quote run on.
Wait, what? Where's an unterminated q
On 11/25/2014 07:44 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-11-25 19:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
hen you find any opener, you seek its
corresponding closer, and then special-case /* to count any
additional /* and look for a */ for each one */ .
That's more or less where I was headed. I just wanted something
On 11/25/2014 07:54 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Tim Daneliuk writes:
Here's the problem: Determine is the string S appears *outside* or
*inside* any such quotation.
This is a problem for parsing text. There is no general, simple
solution.
If someone tries to convince you they have one, be highly
Burak Arslan writes:
> We've gone through the grunt work of researching and integrating
> XMLDSIG, XAdES and UBL schemas and its various extensions and
> dependencies and wrote a bunch of scripts that map these documents to
> python objects.
In this context, I would like to mention "PyXB"
("https
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> Here's a usecase - I want to know whether I need to use a sudo
> password when the user passes a command on the command line of a
> program:
[…]
> In the first instance, I need the sudo passoword, in the second I don't.
I don't understand what “need a sudo password” mean
Ricardo Bánffy writes:
> I must be doing something wrong, but I (and the clever folks at the #python
> channel) can't figure what.
> ...
> Registering Appengine-Fixture-Loader to http://pypi.python.org/pypi
> Server response (401): basic auth failed
>
> So, what am I doing wrong?
I find it strang
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Here's a usecase - I want to know whether I need
> to use a sudo password when the user passes a command on the command line
> of a program:
>
> someprog.py uname && sudo cat /etc/sudoers
>
> vs.
>
> someprog.py uname && echo "sudo cat /etc/su
48 matches
Mail list logo
