> On 6 Mar 2026, at 09:21, Left Right wrote:
>
> However, Python's asyncio is so poorly written, so bloated and
> cumbersome that it's not really worth using it.
The python twisted async library is fast and efficient.
Barru
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-list.python.org
> On 5 Mar 2026, at 18:14, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> The Space
>> Shuttle system had three processors run the same computation as a check.
>
> And, IIRC, the third one was built and programmed by a different outfit.
NASA has been using multiple systems programmed by team that do not
know each
I'm not familiar with the specifics of DNS lookups, but this is some
general info that may be useful to understanding performance:
In principle, asyncio or libraries based on it should be the fastest
solution. This is because it uses the operating system's non-blocking
call where it aggregates mul
On Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:12:35 +, Nuno Silva wrote:
> Five computers, not three. General Purpose Computers, GPCs. Was it "IBM
> AP-101/S"? Four of them run the Primary Avionics Software System, PASS.
I had to double take when I saw the initialism! I have spent a lot of this
week immersed in an
