Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Paul Rubin" <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sorry to be pedantic, but I think it's an important point that no >> court >> ever found that Micro

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

ty being "equated to that of > criminals with guns", and refuses to discuss the issue. Ironically, > while no one else has so much as compared MS to criminals with guns - > after all, they're white collar criminals - David Schwartz called the > DOJ official who were inve

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> "Ironically, while no one else has so much as compared MS to criminals >> with >> guns". I defy you to find *one* place where I complain that MS behavior >> is >> equated to the actual use of force where that is not in

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> There's a huge difference to the non-techy consumer. One of the >>> buggest reasons Linux has had a reputation of being harder to use >>> than Windows was the fact that Linux had to be installed, while >>> Windows

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The quote about the mafia doesn't compare MS's actions to "actual use > of force". I'm sorry, that's just absurd. I won't speculate on what motivates you to engage in such crazy distortion. Of course the quote about

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ok, let me just make my opinion very clear on this and then I'll just > leave this thread altogether. > > I think you are comparing apples and oranges so whatever conclusion you > manage to draw from that i

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> The quote

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Microsoft's behavior consisted of arguments, that is, did not >> involve force, the threat of force, fraud, or the threat of >> fraud. This is perhaps the most vital distinction that there is. > Wrong. Either your defin

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Of course, you've dropped the real point, which is your own inabillity > to distinguish between, as you put it, "guns and arguments." You > always act as if every mention of a crime committed by someone other > than micro

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Another straw man. I'm not trying to oblitarate that difference No matter how many times I quote to you where you specifically do exactly this, you insist you aren't. Yes, you are. You equate metaphorical force wit

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I'm trying to find out why you regularly ignore that difference for >>> everyone but MS. >> To su

Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> You have not disproved that. The closest you've come to a disproof is >> one case where the word "theft&q

Re: Setting timeout for read api

"Paul Rubin" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Swaroop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> PLS HELP..I am working on socket programming as part of my final year >> project. I want to know how to set a timeout on read api that reads >> from a socket. Is it possibl

<    1   2