Wator Sead added the comment:
The point is square brackets, not the address, they (socket.inet_pton and
socket.socket) behave different. Can make it not be accepted, any conditions?
--
versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<ht
Wator Sead added the comment:
Can you try bind "::".
My ask is "Can make a consistent behave via constraints it?".
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bug
Wator Sead added the comment:
[::] can be bound, but the resoult is [::1], you must use this address to
connect. Excuse me, are you a developer of the Python?
>>> import socket
>>> ls = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET6)
>>> cs = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET
Wator Sead added the comment:
I did not build it, just download the Windows pre-built releases.
Can make a consistent behave via constraints it? socket.socket accepted it, but
socket.inet_pton did not.
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
New submission from Wator Sead :
3.6:
>>> import socket
>>> socket.inet_pton(socket.AF_INET6,'[::]')
b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
3.7 and above:
>>> import socket
>>> socket.inet_pton(socket.AF_INET6,'[::]')
Trace
Wator Sead added the comment:
So, that means there are some additional optional operations after
do_handshake(), the data is needed. Thanks for explanation!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Wator Sead added the comment:
Thanks for explanation, I understand what the reason is. But why do_handshake()
not clear of useless data buffer after it is completed? I think that must be
easy to do.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Wator Sead added the comment:
All new releases which include an OpenSSL version above 1.1.1 has the same
issue. Can anybody fix it? Thanks a lot!
--
nosy: +seahoh
versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<ht
Change by Wator Sead :
--
pull_requests: -16425
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38534>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Wator Sead added the comment:
I can't signe the CLA. Someone will make a new PR.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38534>
___
___
Python-bug
Wator Sead added the comment:
PR16881
I just use the right one to replaced them.
--
keywords: +patch
message_count: 2.0 -> 3.0
pull_requests: +16425
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16881
___
New submission from Wator Sead :
https://bugs.python.org/msg347421
Maybe you forgot it, please fix it in next versions.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation, Installation, Windows
messages: 354986
nosy: docs@python, paul.moore, seahoh, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
New submission from Wator Sead :
The current code is:
...
if os.path.dirname(cmd):
if _access_check(cmd, mode):
return cmd
return None
...
In Windows, if 'cmd' include directory path and not include extension name, it
return 'None'.
e.g. a file's path
13 matches
Mail list logo
