Hi there,
My first post here, so hello :)
Just a little background, I am writing my dissertation, which is a JIT
compiler based upon LLVM and it's python bindings, along with the
aperiot LL(1) parser.
I have some code here, which is not behaving as I would expect. Could
someone enlighten me as
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:36 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi there,
My first post here, so hello :)
Just a little background, I am writing my dissertation, which is a JIT
compiler based upon LLVM and it's python bindings, along with the
aperiot LL(1) parser.
I have some code here, which is
But you didn't do an assignment, you did an append. Append modifies the
object, which is referenced by both parent_struct_sig and
this_cdata[struct-sig]
If you're sure you want a *copy* of the list before the modifications,
you might do something like
parent_struct_sig = \
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:49 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi there,
My first post here, so hello :)
Hello and welcome. Let me comment on a few things out of order.
My question is: why has 'parent_struct_sig' changed? I was under the
impression the assignment operator copies, not references.
Hi there,
First of all, thanks to everyone for replying. This has been a great
help.
On Mar 26, 4:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:49 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
My question is: why has 'parent_struct_sig' changed? I was under the
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:01:40 -, Edd Barrett vex...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
A few more comments, based on your code.
def __classdef_integer(self):
Double-underscore name mangling is often more trouble than it is
