Python and Git should get along great.
http://www.ulrikchristensen.dk/scripts/montypython/mrgit.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-On [20090405 06:05], Michele Simionato (michele.simion...@gmail.com) wrote:
P.S. the thing I do not understand if why we are moving
away from Subversion. Will all the new features entered
in 1.5 and 1.6 Subversion is now not so bad as it used to
be and it has the advantage of being already there
In message 262497db-d2fd-4217-978c-
fc5571f10...@c11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, Michele Simionato wrote:
If Martin - which is well above the average programmer -
says that he would need help with Git, I take this as
meaning that most people would get lost with Git.
I don't feel lost with Git.
In message mailman.3331.1238914090.11746.python-l...@python.org, Jeroen
Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
There's situations where a centralised system like SVN works and there's
situations where a DVCS works better.
Most of the people using Subversion seem to be corporates with a
centralized,
On Apr 5, 8:50 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
Michele wrote:
the thing I do not understand if why we are moving
away from Subversion.
Because it's still centralized. That means different developers cannot pursue
parallel branches on their own, those
-On [20090405 09:35], Lawrence D'Oliveiro (l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand)
wrote:
Most of the people using Subversion seem to be corporates with a
centralized, top-down-controlled policy for development.
Not just corporations. An open source or other type of organisation might
just as well
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
asmo...@in-nomine.org wrote:
-On [20090405 06:05], Michele Simionato (michele.simion...@gmail.com) wrote:
P.S. the thing I do not understand if why we are moving
away from Subversion. Will all the new features entered
in 1.5 and 1.6
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org writes:
-On [20090405 09:35], Lawrence D'Oliveiro (l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand)
wrote:
Tell you what, keep the ad-hominem bullshit out of this discussion,
and I agree to do the same. Deal?
I guess I touched a nerve, so you must
-On [20090405 11:15], Ben Finney (ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au) wrote:
If you can look at the process that was followed in this decision and
see “push one solution over all others without regard to what the
current situation demands” you're not looking very hard.
I did not argue the decision for
In message 5f1038cd-b2c7-420d-
bf6e-5872d556f...@u8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, Michele Simionato wrote:
The relevance for me is that at work we use Subversion,
but now that Python uses mercurial I am sure there will
be coworkers wanting to switch to Mercurial and I would
like to understand
If Martin - which is well above the average programmer - says that he
would need help with Git, I take this as meaning that most people
would get lost with Git.
Lawrence I don't feel lost with Git. Does that make me an above-average
Lawrence programmer?
No, perhaps it
April 2009 11:19 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Python Goes Mercurial
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is
that you don't have to create a new directory for branches. This may be
possible in other dvcs's , but git is the only one I've seen advertise
Sorry - it's early and I didn't force Outlook to not top-post.
Unfortunately, I get asked to top-post here at work ...
Tim Delaney
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I don't like git because it is too difficult for me. In many cases,
git would refuse to do operations like updating or local committing,
producing error messages I was not able to understand ...
Post an example of what you were trying to do, with the exact messages, and
we can walk you
I don't like git because it is too difficult for me. In many cases,
git would refuse to do operations like updating or local committing,
producing error messages I was not able to understand ...
Post an example of what you were trying to do, with the exact messages, and
we can walk you
Martin I wasn't really asking for help, merely pointing out that I
Martin dislike git because it makes me ask for help (something I did
Martin not have to do for CVS or subversion, except for very special
Martin cases).
In fact, Martin is generally the guy answering the CVS and
In message 49d80a4a$0$30643$9b622...@news.freenet.de, Martin v. Löwis
wrote:
In message gr647t$jf...@lust.ihug.co.nz, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Post an example of what you were trying to do, with the exact messages,
and we can walk you through it.
Unfortunately, these are many months ago,
On Apr 5, 5:49 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
Everybody needs help sometime. If you're accustomed to centralized version
control (CVS and SVN), it probably takes some time to get used to the way
distributed systems work. It's nothing to be ashamed of.
If
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:02 PM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
Echo wrote:
2009/4/2 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is
that you don't have to create a new directory for branches. This may be
possible in
2009/4/3 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:02 PM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
Echo wrote:
2009/4/2 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is
that you don't have to create a
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
i haven't read the article you link to, but compared to what i've read
on
dev strong antipathies sounds a bit over-hyped.
That was the phrase used by GvR.
well if you find any, please do report back.
I don't like git because it
In message 49d65b62$0$30904$9b622...@news.freenet.de, Martin v. Löwis
wrote:
I don't like git because it is too difficult for me. In many cases,
git would refuse to do operations like updating or local committing,
producing error messages I was not able to understand ...
Post an example of
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
In message 49d65b62$0$30904$9b622...@news.freenet.de, Martin v. Löwis
wrote:
I don't like git because it is too difficult for me. In many
cases, git would refuse to do operations like updating or local
committing, producing
On 2 Apr, 04:27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 7a1dd0d8-1978-470b-
a80d-57478d7f7...@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com, Paul Boddie wrote:
And I've heard stories of bait and
switch with Git: you can do XYZ with Git but not with ... followed
by the
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is that
you don't have to create a new directory for branches. This may be possible
in other dvcs's , but git is the only one I've seen advertise the
capability.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Paul Boddie p...@boddie.org.uk wrote:
You can do it, but as soon as you go to merge with another repo that
had the unedited commit history, you’ll bump into weirdness (and
probably invalidate your whole reason for rebasing, which was to clean
up the history).
On 1 Apr., 07:56, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 35d429fa-5d13-4703-
a443-6a95c740c...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com, John Yeung wrote:
Here's one that clearly expresses strong antipathy:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
On 1 Apr., 07:56, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 35d429fa-5d13-4703-
a443-6a95c740c...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com, John Yeung wrote:
Here's one that clearly expresses strong antipathy:
On 2 Apr., 15:05, David Smith d...@cornell.edu wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
On 1 Apr., 07:56, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 35d429fa-5d13-4703-
a443-6a95c740c...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com, John Yeung wrote:
Here's one that clearly expresses
2009/4/2 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is
that you don't have to create a new directory for branches. This may be
possible in other dvcs's , but git is the only one I've seen advertise the
capability.
--
Echo wrote:
2009/4/2 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com
The one thing that makes me want to use git more than any other dvcs is
that you don't have to create a new directory for branches. This may be
possible in other dvcs's , but git is the only one I've seen advertise
the
capability.
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:24:49 +0100, Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net
wrote:
Good to know. Uninstalling a major feature that enhances usability
just to make it usable isn't much less ironic though.
Meh. Use the command line like God intended.
--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the
Meh. Use the command line like God intended.
I'm sorry to say this Rhodri but there is probably no god ;)
The reason I like overlays is that they are data displays that
highlight changes without letting me do any action. The VCS works for
me before I'm doing any work with it and that's a good
In message 35d429fa-5d13-4703-
a443-6a95c740c...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com, John Yeung wrote:
Here's one that clearly expresses strong antipathy:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087971.html
There are lots of GUI- and Web-based front ends to Git. And look at on-line
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
The relevant PEP is http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/
Interesting. I'm on a project that switched from Mercurial to Git
recently. I don't have much of a sense of the relevant differences
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:25 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mer...
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
On Mar 31, 6:25 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mer...
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
Apparently Mercurial had it's own hate club, and the reaction on
python-dev was
On 1 Apr, 08:18, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
The relevant PEP ishttp://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/
Interesting. I'm on a project that switched from Mercurial to Git
Carl Banks wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:25 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mer...
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
Apparently Mercurial had it's own hate club, and the
In message tq7ca6-8es@ozzie.tundraware.com, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
,,, when I suggested that better open source tools existed, they kindly
explained their complete lack of interest in moving several millions
of lines of code to anything new.
What was their explanation?
--
In message 7a1dd0d8-1978-470b-
a80d-57478d7f7...@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com, Paul Boddie wrote:
And I've heard stories of bait and
switch with Git: you can do XYZ with Git but not with ... followed
by the discovery that you can't realistically do XYZ with Git, either.
Cite?
--
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message tq7ca6-8es@ozzie.tundraware.com, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
,,, when I suggested that better open source tools existed, they kindly
explained their complete lack of interest in moving several millions
of lines of code to anything new.
What was their
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mercurial-version-control-system.ars
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mercurial-version-control-system.ars
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
you're at the wrong group. there's a lot of interesting discussion in
python-dev about this (see thread
In message mailman.3050.1238549891.11746.python-l...@python.org, andrew
cooke wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-
mercurial-version-control-system.ars
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
i haven't
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.3050.1238549891.11746.python-l...@python.org, andrew
cooke wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-
mercurial-version-control-system.ars
So what were these strong antipathies towards
Lawrence D'Oliveiro and andrew cooke exchanged:
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
compared to what i've read on dev
strong antipathies sounds a bit over-hyped.
That was the phrase used by GvR.
well if you find any, please do report back.
Andrew, perhaps you
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/python-adopts-the-mercurial-version-control-system.ars
So what were these strong antipathies towards Git, exactly?
The relevant PEP is http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/
To some Pythonic eyes, the git command
48 matches
Mail list logo
