Re: [Python-mode] Don't bind C-c C-h

2010-03-19 Thread skip
Deniz == Deniz Dogan deniz.a.m.do...@gmail.com writes: Deniz Maybe C-c C-? would work, but I'm not sure how that is recognized Deniz by terminals. Not at all on my Sun (Intel) box running Solaris 10 with a Dell keyboard. It maps to C-c ?... S

Re: [Python-mode] Don't bind C-c C-h

2010-03-19 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 03/19/2010 03:34 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote: ctrl-h *is* sadly the logical key for some help-related function. Would ctrl-c h be an alternative? Hi Reinout. Is that defined in an Emacs Lisp standard somewhere? I'm having a hard time

Re: [Python-mode] Don't bind C-c C-h

2010-03-19 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 03/19/2010 04:21 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Any objections to C-c C-e? None at all. That e-for-explain you mentioned sounds fine. Reinout -- Reinout van Rees - rein...@vanrees.org - http://reinout.vanrees.org Programmer at http://www.nelen-schuurmans.nl Military engineers build missiles.

Re: [Python-mode] Don't bind C-c C-h

2010-03-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 19, 2010, at 05:12 PM, Reinout van Rees wrote: On 03/19/2010 04:21 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Any objections to C-c C-e? None at all. That e-for-explain you mentioned sounds fine. Cool. Bug updated. -B signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Python-mode] simple comment/string-tweak branch

2010-03-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 16, 2010, at 04:22 PM, Tom Roche wrote: Perhaps this will be useful. As I know little about your procedures, had never used bzr at all until yesterday, and had never done a bzr commit until 10 min ago, please let me know if anything needs done better/ correctly. I think you did it just

Re: [Python-mode] simple comment/string-tweak branch

2010-03-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 18, 2010, at 04:19 PM, Deniz Dogan wrote: While we are already updating documentation, could someone change the instructions to use `add-to-list' instead of using `setq' in combination with `cons'? I'm not sure when `add-to-list' was added to Emacs/XEmacs, but I'm pretty sure it's ancient

Re: [Python-mode] plan for emacs python tooling (esp python.el, python-mode.el)?

2010-03-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 16, 2010, at 07:37 AM, Eric M. Ludlam wrote: Exuberent ctags supports python (though I don't know by how much), and adding support in the CEDET/Semantic exuberant ctags support wouldn't be too hard. Likely something like the patch attached. exuberent-tags is a separate package on

Re: [Python-mode] [PDEE] CEDET integration with python-mode.el?

2010-03-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Tom Roche wrote: It Seems To Me (quite possibly naively) that the best/easiest way to get smarter completion particularly, and several more services besides, is to use CEDET or may be (citing my post earlier in this list): Ipython + python-mode + python-ropemacs + pylint