On 4/19/2010 6:12 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Do you have pictures to prove it? :)
(did you really think I could let a comment like that lie unanswered :-)
no, but I do have stories which are really not appropriate for the mailing list
(definitely nsfw^2). One thin hint I'll give you is a.s.b a
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>excellent. do need to work on the naming a bit. As this is two dimensional
>navigation. Previous and next four blocks earlier and later the file and in
>versus out for nesting depth.
>
>block-out
>block-in
>block-previous
>block-next
>block
On Apr 19, 2010, at 04:54 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>On 4/19/2010 4:23 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> User interfaces aren't easy. Especially when people deviate from
>>> capabilities
>>> and endurance of a 20-year-old.
>>
>> Trust me,
On 4/19/2010 4:23 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
User interfaces aren't easy. Especially when people deviate from capabilities
and endurance of a 20-year-old.
Trust me, I am very deviant from the capabilities and endurance of a 20 year
old. :)
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>User interfaces aren't easy. Especially when people deviate from capabilities
>and endurance of a 20-year-old.
Trust me, I am very deviant from the capabilities and endurance of a 20 year
old. :)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
>
>> trying to keep some experimental implementations synced
>> semantically, I'm stumbling about the following:
>>
>> py-goto-block-up (&optional nomark)
>> "Move up to start of current block.
>> Go to the statement that
On 4/16/2010 2:28 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I dunno. If it's useful to people sure, but I doubt I'd use them much.
Sometimes it's just quicker to use C-n and C-p y'know? :)
well duh, if you have working hands it certainly is easier. like
On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
>trying to keep some experimental implementations synced
>semantically, I'm stumbling about the following:
>
>py-goto-block-up (&optional nomark)
> "Move up to start of current block.
>Go to the statement that starts the smallest enclosing bloc
On 4/16/2010 5:27 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
Hi Barry,
trying to keep some experimental implementations synced
semantically, I'm stumbling about the following:
py-goto-block-up (&optional nomark)
"Move up to start of current block.
Go to the statement that starts the smallest enclosing bloc
Hi Barry,
trying to keep some experimental implementations synced
semantically, I'm stumbling about the following:
py-goto-block-up (&optional nomark)
"Move up to start of current block.
Go to the statement that starts the smallest enclosing block; roughly
speaking, this will be the closest pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
