Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #968079 [libapache2-mod-wsgi] libapache2-mod-wsgi: Package is not
installable. Needs older Python2.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
968079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937062 [src:mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937062: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
___
Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:19:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968694: fixed in python-django-jsonfield 1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #968694,
regarding python-django-jsonfield: Missing build dependency on python3-psycopg2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:04:23 +0200
Source: python-django-jsonfield
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Raphaël Hertzog
Closes:
python-django-jsonfield_1.4.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
python-django-jsonfield_1.4.0-2.dsc
python-django-jsonfield_1.4.0-2.debian.tar.xz
python-django-jsonfield_1.4.0-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:html5lib
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #968630 (http://bugs.debian.org/968
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:50:34 +0200
Source: python-qtconsole
Architecture: source
Version: 4.7.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Changes
python-qtconsole_4.7.6-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-qtconsole_4.7.6-1.dsc
python-qtconsole_4.7.6.orig.tar.gz
python-qtconsole_4.7.6-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
___
<<< text/html; charset="utf-8": Unrecognized >>>
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:44:20 +0300
Source: sphinx-rtd-theme
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Dmitry Shachnev
Changes:
sphinx-rtd-theme_0.5.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sphinx-rtd-theme_0.5.0+dfsg-1.dsc
sphinx-rtd-theme_0.5.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
sphinx-rtd-theme_0.5.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
sphinx-rtd-theme_0.5.0+dfsg-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
You
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:06:56 +0100
Source: azure-multiapi-storage-python
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Luca Boccassi
Chan
azure-multiapi-storage-python_0.4.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
azure-multiapi-storage-python_0.4.0-1.dsc
azure-multiapi-storage-python_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
azure-multiapi-storage-python_0.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz
azure-multiapi-storage-python_0.4.0-1_
The patch still works for me (on amd64, dpkg-buildpackage in a chroot
with experimental python3-pandas(-lib), sid everything else; keep the
existing pandas025.patch). Anything obviously different about your test
environment?
___
Python-modules-team
binary:python-odoorpc-doc is NEW.
binary:python3-odoorpc is NEW.
binary:python-odoorpc-doc is NEW.
binary:python3-odoorpc is NEW.
source:python-odoorpc is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it
python-odoorpc_0.7.0-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-odoorpc_0.7.0-1~bpo10+1.dsc
python-odoorpc_0.7.0-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
python-odoorpc-doc_0.7.0-1~bpo10+1_all.deb
python-odoorpc_0.7.0-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
python3-odoorpc_0
Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:52:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950924: fixed in python-feather-format 0.3.1+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #950924,
regarding python-feather-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0:
test_boolean_object_nulls / test_sparse_dataframe fail
to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:18:26 +0800
Source: python-feather-format
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.1+dfsg1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Drew Parsons
Closes:
python-feather-format_0.3.1+dfsg1-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
python-feather-format_0.3.1+dfsg1-4.dsc
python-feather-format_0.3.1+dfsg1-4.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
__
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #950924 [python3-feather-format] python-feather-format: FTBFS with pandas
1.0: test_boolean_object_nulls / test_sparse_dataframe fail
Added tag(s) pending.
--
950924: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950924
Debian Bug Tracking S
On 2020-08-24 16:08, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2020-08-24 15:31, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
The patch still works for me
... I'll have to dig
deeper (and try a chroot build).
My bad, looks like I forget to run quilt refresh when I was pushing the
patch in. I actually only had half of it.
The
On 2020-08-24 15:31, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
The patch still works for me (on amd64, dpkg-buildpackage in a chroot
with experimental python3-pandas(-lib), sid everything else; keep the
existing pandas025.patch). Anything obviously different about your
test environment?
To be fair, I didn't tr
22 matches
Mail list logo
