[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060039: lirc: atilibusb driver no longer present

Package: lirc Version: 0.10.2-0.2 Dear Maintainer, My remote control wasn't working today, and I saw this error in my logs: lircd[117053]: Driver `atilibusb' not found or not loadable (wrong or missing -U/--plugindir?). I suspect this may be related to bug #810445; however, the package still sh

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Hello, > > We do want modinfo on the linux platform, please make this os- > > specific. > Thanks for having a look, feel free to NMU when you agree on the patch. Alec might be overbusy, I'm pretty sure he doesn't mind some extra help :) G. ___ P

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060557: lirc: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.2-0.4 Severity: normal User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: systemd-dev Hi, your package lirc declares a Build-Depends on systemd and/or udev. In most cases, this build dependency is added to get the paths that are defined in udev.pc or syste

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: Found Hurd bug in 0.10.2-0.{3, 4}

found 1060093 0.10.2-0.3 found 1060093 0.10.2-0.4 thanks ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 23:20:54 +0100, a ecrit: > On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 21:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > > --- a/debian/rules  2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > > > +++ b/debian/rules  2024-01-02 12

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 21:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your patches. > > Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > --- a/debian/rules  2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > > +++ b/debian/rules  2024-01-02 12:49:12.0 +0100 > > @@

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1049614: lirc: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build

control: fixed -1 0.10.2-0.2 control: close -1 thanks G. On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:42:49 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build User: debian...@lists.debia

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Hello, Thanks for your patches. Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > --- a/debian/rules2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > +++ b/debian/rules2024-01-02 12:49:12.0 +0100 > @@ -4,7 +4,14 @@ > include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk > > export DEB_BUILD_

[Python-modules-team] failed armel build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: armel * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: arm-conova-02.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=armel&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703325732&file=log Please note that these notifications do n

[Python-modules-team] failed amd64 build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: amd64 * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: x86-ubc-02.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=amd64&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703423593&file=log Please note that these notifications do not

[Python-modules-team] failed arm64 build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: arm64 * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: arm-ubc-02.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=arm64&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703334854&file=log Please note that these notifications do not

[Python-modules-team] failed armhf build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: armhf * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: arm-conova-01.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=armhf&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703325725&file=log Please note that these notifications do n

[Python-modules-team] failed mips64el build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: mips64el * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: mipsel-osuosl-05.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=mips64el&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703394987&file=log Please note that these notificat

[Python-modules-team] failed amd64 build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: amd64 * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: x86-conova-01.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=amd64&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703325780&file=log Please note that these notifications do n

[Python-modules-team] failed i386 build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: i386 * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: x86-ubc-02.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=i386&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703325823&file=log Please note that these notifications do not ne

[Python-modules-team] failed s390x build of lirc 0.10.2-0.1

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.2-0.1 * Architecture: s390x * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: zani.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=s390x&ver=0.10.2-0.1&stamp=1703325734&file=log Please note that these notifications do not necess

[Python-modules-team] Bug#989304: lirc FTCBFS: multiple reasons

Hi Vagrant, On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:43:18AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I tried this patch against the current sources, but now it fails at > dh_auto_configure. > > Build log attached for cross-building i386 (also tried arm64 and armhf > with the same basic issue). I think this is all w

[Python-modules-team] failed all build of lirc 0.10.1-7.3

* Source package: lirc * Version: 0.10.1-7.3 * Architecture: all * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: x86-csail-02.debian.org * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lirc&arch=all&ver=0.10.1-7.3&stamp=1702689705&file=log Please note that these notifications do not ne

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1052309: Bumping severity to important, 2 weeks till RC

Control: severity -1 important Hi, As requested by Helmut, bumping severity of these bugs to important. systemd.pc will be changed to point to /usr in 2 weeks (November 30th), at which point the severity will be bumped again to RC for all these bugs. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.a

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1052309: NMU fixing FTBFS, cross-building and reproducible builds bugs

I've uploaded an NMU fixing several cross building and reproducible builds bugs and an RC bug to DELAYED/10. The changes should also be available via dgit. debdiff follows: diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2022-12-28 03:25

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1052309: Bumping severity to serious

Control: severity -1 serious Hi, As requested by Helmut, bumping severity of these bugs to important. systemd.pc has just now been changed to point to /usr/lib/systemd/system for the unit installation directory and the affected packages will start to FTBFS. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi sign

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1056311: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 in the patch

[Python-modules-team] Bug#979024: lirc: reproducible builds: ships tarball of python sources

On 2021-01-01, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The lirc package ships a /usr/share/lirc/lirc-VERSION.tar.gz tarball. > > This tarball contains timestamps produced during the build, can be > affected by the umask of the build environment. > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bulls