[Python-modules-team] Bug#610390: pisa doesn't support non-latin symbols

2022-04-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: xhtml2pdf Version: 0.2.5-1 Followup-For: Bug #610390 As discussed in upstream issue #11, xhtml2pdf is deprecated (no longer supported). The xhtml2pdf documentaiton itself (https://github.com/xhtml2pdf/xhtml2pdf/blob/master/README.rst) says to use WeasyPrint (http://weasyprint.org/)

[Python-modules-team] Bug#972906: Bug#972906: monty: new upstream release available

2020-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-10-27 03:11, Emmanuel Arias wrote: Hi Drew, I push to salsa the new upstream release (4.0.2) Cheers, Arias Emmanuel Looks good. Uploading. ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Python-modules-team] Bug#972906: Bug#972906: monty: new upstream release available

2020-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-10-27 03:11, Emmanuel Arias wrote: Hi Drew, I push to salsa the new upstream release (4.0.2) Thanks Emmanuel. I'll check and upload. Drew ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Python-modules-team] Bug#972906: Bug#972906: monty: new upstream release available

2020-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
(again) thanks! Cheers, Arias Emmanuel @eamanu http://eamanu.com El lun., 26 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:22, Drew Parsons (dpars...@debian.org) escribió: Great! I'll be happy to sponsor. Drew On 2020-10-26 19:19, Emmanuel Arias wrote: Hi, Ok, I will ask sponsorship for the source upload

[Python-modules-team] Bug#972906: Bug#972906: monty: new upstream release available

2020-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
, Drew Parsons (dpars...@debian.org) escribió: Source: monty Severity: normal Thanks for packaging monty! It will need another source-only upload in order to migrate to testing. While preparing that upload, could the version be updated to the latest upstream release at the same time? The latest

[Python-modules-team] Bug#972906: monty: new upstream release available

2020-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: monty Severity: normal Thanks for packaging monty! It will need another source-only upload in order to migrate to testing. While preparing that upload, could the version be updated to the latest upstream release at the same time? The latest pymatgen 2020.10.20 requires monty >= 4.0.2

[Python-modules-team] Bug#950924: python-feather-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0: test_boolean_object_nulls / test_sparse_dataframe fail

2020-08-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-08-24 16:08, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2020-08-24 15:31, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: The patch still works for me ... I'll have to dig deeper (and try a chroot build). My bad, looks like I forget to run quilt refresh when I was pushing the patch in. I actually only had half

[Python-modules-team] Bug#950924: python-feather-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0: test_boolean_object_nulls / test_sparse_dataframe fail

2020-08-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-08-24 15:31, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: The patch still works for me (on amd64, dpkg-buildpackage in a chroot with experimental python3-pandas(-lib), sid everything else; keep the existing pandas025.patch). Anything obviously different about your test environment? To be fair, I didn't

[Python-modules-team] Bug#950924: python-feather-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0: test_boolean_object_nulls / test_sparse_dataframe fail

2020-08-23 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: python-feather-format Followup-For: Bug #950924 X-Debbugs-Cc: "Rebecca N. Palmer" Hi Rebecca, could you check the #950924 patch for python-feather-format? I applied tha patch, but it's still failing against pandas 1.0.4+dfsg-1. test_boolean_object_nulls still fails the same way, and

[Python-modules-team] Bug#961206: improve sphinx usage for cross building

2020-05-28 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: sphinx Followup-For: Bug #961206 I've just updated numba from Build-Depends: python3-sphinx to Build-Depends: sphinx as recommended here (#961741). The change is giving me a lintian error: E: numba source: missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon sphinxdoc => python-sphinx |

[Python-modules-team] Bug#961741: python3-sphinx: new release broke sphinx-build OUTPUTDIR

2020-05-28 Thread Drew Parsons
Control: reassign -1 src:numba On 2020-05-29 00:36, Simon McVittie wrote: On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 00:02:46 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: http_proxy='127.0.0.1:9' /usr/share/sphinx/scripts/python3/sphinx-build /usr/bin/sphinx-build -N -bhtml \ .pybuild/cpython3_3.8_numba

[Python-modules-team] Bug#961741: python3-sphinx: new release broke sphinx-build OUTPUTDIR

2020-05-28 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-sphinx Version: 2.4.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The new release 2.4.3-3 appears to have broken sphinx-build. It no longer recognises the OUTPUTDIR argument. This causes numba to FTBFS (OUTPUTDIR here is

[Python-modules-team] Bug#957780: scipy: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scipy Followup-For: Bug #957780 https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/2262 takes it up further: -fallow-argument-mismatch would be a better (more targetted) flag than -std=legacy ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#957780: scipy: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scipy Followup-For: Bug #957780 The error is gfortran:f77: scipy/sparse/linalg/eigen/arpack/ARPACK/SRC/dsaitr.f gfortran:f77: scipy/sparse/linalg/eigen/arpack/ARPACK/SRC/cnaitr.f scipy/sparse/linalg/eigen/arpack/ARPACK/SRC/dsaitr.f:671:35: 369 | call dvout (logfil, 1,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#957780: scipy: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scipy Followup-For: Bug #957780 In any case, addressed upstream, https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/11842 ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Python-modules-team] Bug#946625: scipy debci tests

2020-04-18 Thread Drew Parsons
No, the blacklist appears to be preventing me from launching them. On 2020-04-18 15:08, Graham Inggs wrote: Hi Drew On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 08:46, Drew Parsons wrote: I've uploaded scipy 1.4 to unstable. Tests run normally on my system. Could we trigger some debci tests to check

[Python-modules-team] Bug#946625: scipy debci tests

2020-04-18 Thread Drew Parsons
I've uploaded scipy 1.4 to unstable. Tests run normally on my system. Could we trigger some debci tests to check if the new version has resolved the test problem? Ideally, say, 2 a day for the next 5 days to get a sample size of 10? (unless the test failure proves reproducible every time

[Python-modules-team] Bug#610390: pisa doesn't support non-latin symbols

2020-01-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-xhtml2pdf Version: 0.2.2-5 Followup-For: Bug #610390 Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xhtml2pdf/xhtml2pdf/issues/11 This bug is reported upstream, see https://github.com/xhtml2pdf/xhtml2pdf/issues/11 and https://github.com/xhtml2pdf/xhtml2pdf/issues/345 etc. Apparently

[Python-modules-team] Bug#592500: python-pisa: xhtml2pdf stdout output unusable

2020-01-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-xhtml2pdf Version: 0.2.2-5 Followup-For: Bug #592500 For what it's worth, the generated pdf is still viewable in evince, xpdf, okular, even with the diagnostic output embedded in the file. So the output is not unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938157: Bug#938157: python-scipy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-13 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-01-14 02:13, Sandro Tosi wrote: >It's just that there is no extra effort required in this case. >python3-scipy does indeed need the effort taken, but once that effort >is >done, it's no more effort to apply the same fix to python-scipy. So >yes, please do focus on fixing python3-scipy!

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938157: Bug#938157: python-scipy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-12 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-01-13 12:47, Sandro Tosi wrote: Thanks Sandro. There is RC bug#946624 affecting python-scipy, with a counterpart in #946625 for python3-scipy. Something subtle has changed in the syntax for skipping tests, I haven't figured out what yet. Help needed. Since that problem needs to be

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938157: python-scipy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-12 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-01-13 09:52, Sandro Tosi wrote: we finally reach the point were src:python-scipy produces only leaf binary packages (excluding packages that are not in testing because RC already), so i think it's time to file for its removal, and continue with src:scipy. I've copied maintainers and

[Python-modules-team] Bug#946625: scipy: autopkgtest regularly times out

2020-01-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Thanks Håvard. Placing @pytest.mark.skip will get the job so worse come to worse we can deal with it that way. The reason why I'd prefer not to do it that way is that that here we only want to control the tests being run from debian/tests. The @pytest.mark.skip will disable them for all

[Python-modules-team] Bug#946624: python-scipy: autopkgtest regularly times out

2019-12-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.2.2-11 Followup-For: Bug #946624 Control: tags -1 help The rules for skipping the failing tests (test_sparsetools.TestInt32Overflow) are already in place in debian/tests/python2 It looks like something must have changed in pytest such that the skip instructions

[Python-modules-team] Bug#946625: scipy: autopkgtest regularly times out

2019-12-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scipy Followup-For: Bug #946625 Control: tags -1 help The rules for skipping the failing tests (test_sparsetools.TestInt32Overflow) are already in place in debian/tests/python3 It looks like something must have changed in pytest such that the skip instructions are now being ignored.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#873433: python-scipy-doc: spc-bootstrap.* refer to fonts.googleapis.com

2019-12-03 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy-doc Version: 1.3.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #873433 It's in doc/scipy-sphinx-theme/_theme/scipy/static/css/spc-bootstrap.css doc/scipy-sphinx-theme/_theme/scipy/static/less/spc-bootstrap.less I daresay we can just remove the line and let the local system find its own "Open

[Python-modules-team] Bug#942235: Bug#942235: python-xarray needed new dask as well?

2019-11-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-11-04 01:15, Emmanuel Arias wrote: Hi, I've just prepare the new upstream release (for some reason the upstream branch was not merge to master). [1] Emmanuel, the work-in-progress is in the experimental branch. Push to experimental first before pulling into master. Drew

[Python-modules-team] Bug#942235: dask: autopkgtest needs update for new version of pytest

2019-10-28 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-10-29 03:01, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: Assuming we're talking about https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/dask/blob/experimental/debian/patches/use-local-intersphinx.patch I think the actual problem is on the numpy line: it adds the local inventory but doesn't remove the online

[Python-modules-team] Bug#942235: dask: autopkgtest needs update for new version of pytest

2019-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: dask Followup-For: Bug #942235 Fixed upstream, latest version is pushed to the experimental branch. Needs sphinx-click, which is in the NEW queue. Drew -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')

[Python-modules-team] Bug#943559: ITP: python3-sphinx-click -- A Sphinx plugin to automatically document click-based applications

2019-10-26 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Drew Parsons * Package name: python3-sphinx-click Version : 2.1.0 Upstream Author : Stephen Finucane http://that.guru/ * URL : https://github.com/click-contrib/sphinx-click * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python

[Python-modules-team] Bug#942900: python3-pluggy Depends: python3-importlib-metadata

2019-10-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-pluggy Version: 0.13.0-1 Severity: normal Control: affects -1 python3-fiat pluggy does import importlib_metadata, at least with python3.7 python3-pluggy should therefore Depends: python3-importlib-metadata The bug can be seen in fiat tests,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#934806: python3-scipy: test_nan_inputs hangs on hppa, riscv64, sparc64

2019-08-15 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-scipy Version: 1.3.1-1exp1 Severity: normal Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/10656 hppa, riscv64, sparc64 are hanging on the same built-time test, stopping at test_nan_inputs[iv]:

[Python-modules-team] Bug#933914: python3-pytest: pytest v4 breaks existing tests

2019-08-08 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-08-08 15:57, Ondřej Nový wrote: I see, coming from flaky. Thanks Ondrej. this should be fixed now with python-flaky 3.6.1-1. Thanks again Ondrej. That fixes the mpi4py 3.0.2-10 tests. Drew ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#933914: python3-pytest: pytest v4 breaks existing tests

2019-08-06 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-08-07 03:41, Novy, Ondrej wrote: Hi, Drew Parsons píše v Út 06. 08. 2019 v 17:25 +0800: e.g what to do about ... "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/flaky/flaky_pytest_plugin.py", line 272, in call_runtest_hook INTERNALERROR> when=when, INTERNALERROR> Typ

[Python-modules-team] Bug#933914: python3-pytest: pytest v4 breaks existing tests

2019-08-06 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-08-05 16:37, Novy, Ondrej wrote: Tags: wontfix On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 11:43:39 +0800 Drew Parsons wrote: This upgrade should be treated as a Transition, uploading the package to experimental first. We are not using Transitions for Python upgrades because almost every module upgrade

[Python-modules-team] Bug#933914: python3-pytest: pytest v4 breaks existing tests

2019-08-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-pytest Version: 4.6.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks autopkgtest tests Control: affects -1 + src:apipkg src:betamax src:ccdproc src:chardet Control: affects -1 + src:dask src:django-axes src:doit src:drms Control: affects -1 + src:fiat src:mpi4py src:pandas

[Python-modules-team] Bug#860138: scipy handles error messages poorly

2019-07-26 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.2.2-1 Tags: + moreinfo Followup-For: Bug #860138 Hi James, we'll need a test case that triggers the error message in order to process this bug. Drew ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914655: Bug#929296: libopenblas-base: is libopenblas.so needed?

2019-05-21 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-05-21 19:55, Mo Zhou wrote: On 2019-05-21 09:13, Drew Parsons wrote: Perhaps our scipy build should explicitly avoid libopenblas.so by setting export BLAS=/path/to/libblas.so export LAPACK=/path/to/liblapack.so as suggested at http://scipy.github.io/devdocs/building/linux.html

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914655: Bug#929296: libopenblas-base: is libopenblas.so needed?

2019-05-21 Thread Drew Parsons
. In that case tt links against liblapack.so.3 as it should. On 2019-05-21 04:57, Drew Parsons wrote: The problem is that libopenblasp-r0.3.5.so contains exactly the same symbols as libblas.so and liblapack.so. This seems to be confusing linkers, e.g. see Bug#914655 for python-scipy. The Debian

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914655: python-scipy: _flapack undefined symbol: ilaver_

2019-05-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #914655 Digging a bit deeper, I think this bug may be impacted by the presence of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenblas.so provide by libopenblas-base I think you will find your bug may be present in local builds of scipy, but the official Debian builds

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-04-10 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 Should be easier than it looks: the structure is already in place in debian/tests/python2. ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-04-08 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.1.0-4 Followup-For: Bug #919929 Curiously, only python2 is affected now. Same sympton, MemoryError, now in TestInt32Overflow.test_matvecs and TestInt32Overflow.test_dia_matvec. Assuming the MemoryError is again triggered by excessive warnings, the warning

[Python-modules-team] Bug#723722: python-scipy: stats.nanmean prints a warning when using NaN only array

2019-03-29 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #723722 Apologies, I was trying to cancel my previous message but it slipped through by accident, so please ignore it. What I found was that the warning is emitted in all cases, whether np.nanmean([np.nan, np.nan]) np.nanmean([[np.nan, np.nan]])

[Python-modules-team] Bug#723722: python-scipy: stats.nanmean prints a warning when using NaN only array

2019-03-29 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #723722 nanmean is now removed from scipy.stats (1.1.0-4) np.nanmean will process the array (without a warning) if given as a numpy array (numpy 1:1.16.2-1): >>> np.nanmean(np.array([np.nan, np.nan])) nan ___

[Python-modules-team] Bug#778635: python-scipy bundles library for L-BFGS-B minimization

2019-03-29 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.1.0-4 Followup-For: Bug #778635 Hi Gard, can you provide a simple test script so we can confirm that scipy works correctly after applying your L-BFGS-B patch? Thanks, Drew ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-03-28 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 debci tests are consistently passing with python-scipy/1.1.0-4 I think we can consider this bug resolved now. Drew -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')

[Python-modules-team] Bug#758022: test_interpolate.TestPPoly.test_roots test fails on i386

2019-03-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.1.0-4 Followup-For: Bug #758022 i386 tests are still a problem in 1.1.0-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Incidentally, the matrix DeprecationWarnings related to the test failures seem to have started with the switch of default python3 from 3.6 to 3.7, 21 Nov 2018. Not from numpy as such (certainly not numpy 1.16). Possibly due to https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/4458

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: unblock request: python-scipy/1.1.0-4 skimage/0.14.2-2: autopkgtest passes (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-16 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-16 22:07, Paul Gevers wrote: On 16-03-2019 13:48, Drew Parsons wrote: Is there enough will to add more scipy patches for the buster release to reduce the remaining DeprecationWarnings? (they don't break tests, they're just annoying) Or should we just let it go at this point

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: unblock request: python-scipy/1.1.0-4 skimage/0.14.2-2: autopkgtest passes (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-16 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-11 14:39, Drew Parsons wrote: I've adapted the 3 patches and pushed to salsa, matrix_API_614847c5.patch matrix_API_more_e0cfa29e2.patch matrix_API_filter_check_87e48c3c5.patch https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-scipy/tree/master/debian/patches

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914655: python-scipy: _flapack undefined symbol: ilaver_

2019-03-11 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Version: 1.1.0-4 Followup-For: Bug #914655 This bug was partially fixed in python-scipy 0.19.1-2 when determination of the location of atlas and openblas was fixed. ilaver_ is found in libopenblas.so.0. _flapack.x86_64-linux-gnu.so now has NEEDED libopenblas.so.0 But

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-10 15:46, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2019-03-10 03:51, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Drew, To remove the deprecation warnings we'd need to deal with them at the source. Upstream has patches https://github.com/scipy/scipy/commit/614847c5fc8d5f8a618980df3c1b93540428ae46 https://github.com

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-09 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-10 03:51, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Drew, On 08-03-2019 03:08, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2019-03-07 20:46, Paul Gevers wrote: If you upload now, your package will not migrate to testing before the full freeze becomes effective so it would need an unblock. If you want to fix this issue

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-07 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-07 20:46, Paul Gevers wrote: If you upload now, your package will not migrate to testing before the full freeze becomes effective so it would need an unblock. If you want to fix this issue with the three lines I saw in the bug report, you can go ahead. However, it is probably worth

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-07 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-07 20:46, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Drew, On 07-03-2019 13:19, Drew Parsons wrote: python-scipy is currently failing all debci tests in both unstable and testing. autopkgtest only, so no FTBFS? That's right, scipy builds fine. Some of us want failing autopkgtest to be RC *after

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-07 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-07 19:00, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Drew, On 07-03-2019 09:03, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 07:01:54PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: python-scipy has recently started failing all debci tests in testing and unstable, exacerbating the bug report in Bug#919929 [1

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-03-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 Probably a simple pytest.ini diff between scipy 1.1 and 1.2 makes the simplest patch: --- pytest.ini.old 2019-03-05 18:36:51.532842277 +0800 +++ pytest.ini 2019-02-28 11:57:04.155637459 +0800 @@ -7,5 +7,8 @@ error

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-03-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 No, I am wrong. Tests are pytest, the junit reference is --junitxml, indicated test reports are in junit format. The question then, is why is the instruction in pytest.ini to ignore deprecation warnings not being honoured? Ah I see it. I'm

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-03-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 Note PendingDeprecationWarning is set to be ignored in pytest.ini. The problem is that the tests in debian/tests do not use pytest... ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails intermittently

2019-03-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python-scipy Followup-For: Bug #919929 Something weird going on with the scipy tests. There's a clue in this bug report already: "MemoryError". Fails are now consistent since 25/2/2019. The funny thing is, even when I try to access the test log for the last successful