[Python-modules-team] Bug#971564: python-pygit2: libgit2 1.0 transition

2020-12-01 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, if you want to proceed with the transition, maybe it's a good idea to upload libgit2 to unstable first :) python-pygit2 is ready for transition since 12 Jun 2020 (in experimental). -- Best regards Ondřej Nový ___ Python-modules-team mailing list P

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938756: Bug#952130: Bug#937769: getting python-linecache2/python-traceback2 fixes into testing (FAO traceback2, funcsigs nipype and numba maintainers).

2020-04-22 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 21. 4. 2020 v 23:24 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > > But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of > > pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and > > it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules > > we

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938470: Please revert

2020-02-04 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, čt 30. 1. 2020 v 22:05 odesílatel Ondrej Novy napsal: > Python 2 package is needed for many other packages: > same is valid for PyPy version: onovy@sid:~$ reverse-depends -b pypy-setuptools-scm Reverse-Build-Depends * backports.functools-lru-cache * pytest * python-importlib-me

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#938819: wheel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-31 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi Dmitry, čt 30. 1. 2020 v 22:38 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev napsal: > However upstream python-keyring has dropped Python 2 support, and I want > to upgrade to a newer release, so Python 2 support will be dropped sooner > or later. > upstream drop of Python 2 support doesn't mean you need to dr

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#938819: wheel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-30 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, čt 30. 1. 2020 v 10:10 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev napsal: > setuptools-scm has removed Python 2 support (see #938470), so > python-keyring > build-dependencies are no longer satisfiable. > > Thus I am going to remove Python 2 support from python-keyring please don't, because #938470 should

[Python-modules-team] Bug#938470: Please revert

2020-01-30 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, Python 2 package is needed for many other packages: onovy@sid:~$ reverse-depends -b python-setuptools-scm Reverse-Build-Depends * apipkg * automat * backports.functools-lru-cache * cherrypy3 * execnet * keyrings.alt * monkeysign * pytest * pytest-forked * pytest-runner * pytest-xdist * python

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-sphinx-issues_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2019-10-27 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, ne 27. 10. 2019 v 16:00 odesílatel Scott Kitterman < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> napsal: > NOTICE mentions that some source comes from Jeff Forcier, which is under > the > BSD-2-clause license. This copyright holder and license is not mentioned in > d/copyright. > right, stupid me, sorr

[Python-modules-team] Bug#934959:

2019-08-24 Thread Ondrej Novy
reassign 934959 src:sunpy 0.9.6-2 thx This is bug in sunpy, using StopIteration in newer Python 3. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cg

[Python-modules-team] Bug#915198: Bug#915198: python-molotov FTBFS: BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe

2018-12-21 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, I can't reproduce it and I can build this package locally without any problem. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@ali

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914592: Bug#914592: Upcoming pytest-4 problems

2018-11-27 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 27. 11. 2018 v 8:46 odesílatel Ole Streicher napsal: > Thanks, however it turns out that this will unfortunately not work for > me: from astropys POV, pytest seems to be broken in versions 3.7 - 3.10; > see > > https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/8177 according to linked issue, th

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914592: Bug#914592: Upcoming pytest-4 problems

2018-11-26 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, my plan is: - keep 3.x for Buster - upgrade to >= 4.x just after Buster release Because we are going to drop Python after Buster release, I think it's perfectly fine that Astropy (Py2 version) will not support Pytest 4.x. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914420: Bug#914420: Bug#914420: python-pytest: Breaks many Python 2 test suites

2018-11-23 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, pá 23. 11. 2018 v 13:21 odesílatel Ole Streicher napsal: > By reading the upstream changelog, I could not find a cause what should > cause the incompatibility. Also, the logs now all contain a warning like > me either. :( > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/_pytest/cacheprovider.py:58 >

[Python-modules-team] Bug#914420: Bug#914420: python-pytest: Breaks many Python 2 test suites

2018-11-23 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi Ole, this looks like bug in astropy and other packages. They are just not compatible with newer pytest. For example astropy upstream uses pytest 3.9 and/or 3.10 for testing code, see https://github.com/astropy/astropy/commit/3e34e7c450ebd982978423d8774ef6953832f610 I tried to build simple pac

[Python-modules-team] Bug#910355: Bug#910355: enum34: Please package for Python3

2018-10-05 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, pá 5. 10. 2018 v 11:21 odesílatel Neil Williams napsal: > I'm looking to package a new python3 utility which will depend > on python3-enum34 and the homepage link from this source package > claims support for python3. > enum34 is backport of enum from Python 3.4. It doesn't make sense to pa

[Python-modules-team] Bug#909936: python3-changelog: Please make building changelogs reproducible

2018-10-01 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, po 1. 10. 2018 v 10:38 odesílatel Chris Lamb napsal: > In the past we have tried not to burden maintainers with the knowledge > that their packages are unreproducible and/or causing others to be so, > in that spirit, I am following up with the attached patch. > I looked into code and wasn't

[Python-modules-team] Bug#907168: Bug#907168: pytest-httpbin FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1

2018-08-29 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 28. 8. 2018 v 15:36 odesílatel Pierre-Elliott Bécue napsal: > This would imply to do a Debian patch in upstream's source. > I had similar bug in eventlet, solution: https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/pull/516 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-eventlet/commit/32dc98ce3

[Python-modules-team] Bug#901568: Bug#901568: Please package new upstream version >= 3.4.0 as python-neovim Build-Depends on it

2018-06-15 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, I prepared new upstream version (3.6.2) in git. It needs new version of atomicwrites and more-itertools which I prepared in git too. Both will go trough NEW queue (new pypy-* binary packages). After this deps will be in unstable I will finish+upload pytest 3.6.2. Thanks. -- Best regards O

[Python-modules-team] Bug#899403: Bug#899403: Re : Bug#899403: pymodbus: Please provide a python3 package

2018-05-24 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2018-05-24 10:15 GMT+02:00 Cédric : > I got a look to the dependencies: I think that python-six is missing (cf. > pymodbus/utilities.py). > https://packages.debian.org/sid/python3-six :) (already in Debian from wheezy) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB

Re: [Python-modules-team] Mass-commit fix of lintian ancient-python-version-field

2018-05-11 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2018-05-11 0:19 GMT+02:00 Joseph Herlant : > ... maybe we could delete the pycompat file > when exists at the same time (in a separate commit of course) to to > get rid of debian-pycompat-is-obsolete. It seems there are still 18 > python modules with that file in. > no problem, so just remov

[Python-modules-team] Mass-commit fix of lintian ancient-python-version-field

2018-05-10 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, because of: - https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide?action=diff&rev1=85&rev2=86 - https://lintian.debian.org/tags/ancient-python-version-field.html I would like to mass commit into DPMT/PAPT this: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pytest/commit/a737368e75cb2e7

Re: [Python-modules-team] Asking for packaging

2018-05-10 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, 2018-05-09 16:02 GMT+02:00 eamanu15 : > When I make a push to the package that I maintain on salsa repo. Is > necessary upload the package to debian-mentors too? > after you push changes to salsa repo, you need sponsor for upload. Best way to find sponsor for DPMT packages is to join IRC #de