Hi,
Thanks for your replies.
On 19/08/2018 12:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> According to apt-file(1), python3-pycryptodome contains
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/Cryptodome, which you use via "import
> Cryptodome". If you're renaming packages anyway, would it be better for
> the package containi
>I'm not sure of the transition policies when handling transitions on
>testing and unstable only (ie: not involving stable).
>But that should ensure there is no breakage between package in the archive.
if you are just renaming a package,, and the reverse-deps are not too many,
better avoid tran
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 16:31:37 +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> To fix #886291, we should:
> - Rename python3-pycryptodome to python3-pycryptodomex
> - Reuse python3-pycryptodome package name to package a non compatible
> python3 module.
>
> The rationale of this rename + reuse is that currently,
>
Hi mentors,
I'm trying to find the best solution for a package renaming of pycryptodome.
This package exists for both python3 and python2. For simplicity, I will
talk only about python3 packages.
The package is not in stable.
Currently, we have in testing and unstable:
- python3-pycryptodome
- p