[Python-modules-team] django-environ_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-01-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:python-django-environ is NEW. binary:python3-django-environ is NEW. source:django-environ is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-environ_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes

2016-01-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
django-environ_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: django-environ_0.4.0-1.dsc django-environ_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz django-environ_0.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz python-django-environ_0.4.0-1_all.deb python3-django-environ_0.4.0-1_all.deb Greetings,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#806367: marked as done (sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS with Django 1.9)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:45:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#806367: fixed in sorl-thumbnail 12.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #806367, regarding sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS with Django 1.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

[Python-modules-team] sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-01-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:46:39 + Source: sorl-thumbnail Binary: python-sorl-thumbnail python3-sorl-thumbnail python-sorl-thumbnail-doc Architecture: source all Version: 12.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintain

[Python-modules-team] Processed: reassign 810143 to liblapack3

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 810143 liblapack3 3.6.0-1 Bug #810143 [python3-scipy] sgegv_ symbol was removed without SONAME change Bug reassigned from package 'python3-scipy' to 'liblapack3'. No longer marked as found in versions python-scipy/0.16.1-1. Ignoring reque

[Python-modules-team] Processed: severity of 810143 is serious

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 810143 serious Bug #810143 [python3-scipy] sgegv_ symbol was removed without SONAME change Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 810143: http://bugs.de

[Python-modules-team] Processed: retitle 810143 to sgegv_ symbol was removed without SONAME change

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 810143 sgegv_ symbol was removed without SONAME change Bug #810143 [python3-scipy] scipy/linalg/_flapack.cpython-34m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: sgegv_ Changed Bug title to 'sgegv_ symbol was removed without SONAME change' from

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810143: scipy/linalg/_flapack.cpython-34m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: sgegv_

2016-01-06 Thread Diane Trout
Package: python3-scipy Version: 0.16.1-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to liblapack3 3.6.0-1 I saw the missing symbol error when rerunning an analysis. Downgrading to liblapack3 3.5.0 fixes the issue. It looks like there's some work to fix this issue in the next release of

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810139: Bug#810139: kivy: FTBFS: TypeError: can't pickle Cython.Compiler.FlowControl.NameAssignment objects

2016-01-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 08:56:40 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: kivy > Version: 1.9.0-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Dear

[Python-modules-team] Processing of sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1_amd64.changes

2016-01-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1.dsc sorl-thumbnail_12.3.orig.tar.gz sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1.debian.tar.xz python-sorl-thumbnail-doc_12.3-1_all.deb python-sorl-thumbnail_12.3-1_all.deb python3-sorl-thumbnail

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810139: kivy: FTBFS: TypeError: can't pickle Cython.Compiler.FlowControl.NameAssignment objects

2016-01-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: kivy Version: 1.9.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, kivy fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..] copy

Re: [Python-modules-team] Question about Django in bpo8

2016-01-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Thanks for your quick response! On 2016-01-06 10:10, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I don't plan to push 1.9.x in backports. 1.8.x is an LTS version and I > expect most Debian stable users would like to use an LTS version. This is certainly true! > Ah, if we had bikesheds already... then I would maint

[Python-modules-team] Processed: retitle 809980 to python-rsa: CVE-2016-1494: Signature forgery using Bleichenbacher'06 attack ...

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 809980 python-rsa: CVE-2016-1494: Signature forgery using > Bleichenbacher'06 attack Bug #809980 [src:python-rsa] python-rsa: signature forgery vulnerability Changed Bug title to 'python-rsa: CVE-2016-1494: Signature forgery using Bleich

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810123: python3-websocket: embedded copy of Mozilla CA bundle

2016-01-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: python3-websocket Version: 0.18.0-2 Usertags: embedded-code-copy This package ships embedded (and outdated) copy of Mozilla CA bundle in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/websocket/cacert.pem. Please remove this file from the binary package and patch the code to use /etc/ssl/certs/ca-cer

[Python-modules-team] sorl-thumbnail REMOVED from testing

2016-01-06 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the sorl-thumbnail source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 12.2-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #806367: sorl-thumbnail: FTBFS with Django 1.9 The script tha

[Python-modules-team] txaws REMOVED from testing

2016-01-06 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the txaws source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.2.3-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #807347: txaws: FTBFS: twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: '500' != 500

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810108: python3-genshi: _speedups extension module doesn't end up in python3-genshi

2016-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
Package: python3-genshi Version: 0.7-5 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, ScottK pointed this out to me last night, but I don't have time right now to debug this, so I'm filing this bug in case someone else has time and inclination, and so it won't

[Python-modules-team] Bug#806182: Will fix python-django-registration RCs shortly (Was: Re: Request to join DPMT && python-django-registration)

2016-01-06 Thread James Bennett
Stephan Sürken wrote: > Let's see if I got this right: > > django-registration is actually no longer discontinued, and now lives at > > https://github.com/ubernostrum/django-registration > > The (incompatible) *-redux fork lives at > > https://github.com/macropin/django-registration Yes. djang

[Python-modules-team] django-python3-ldap_0.9.8-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-01-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:02:03 +0100 Source: django-python3-ldap Binary: python-django-python3-ldap python3-django-python3-ldap Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian

[Python-modules-team] Bug#806182: Will fix python-django-registration RCs shortly (Was: Re: Request to join DPMT && python-django-registration)

2016-01-06 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi James, On Mi, 2016-01-06 at 06:23 -0600, James Bennett wrote: (...) > > So the 1st question for me is whether it's really a drop-in replacement, > > or if we might, at this point, create a new package *-redux (maybe with > > the option to fix #567739, too). > > -redux is not a drop-in replacem

[Python-modules-team] Bug#806182: Will fix python-django-registration RCs shortly (Was: Re: Request to join DPMT && python-django-registration)

2016-01-06 Thread James Bennett
Stephan Sürken wrote: >> As for p-d-r in general: Has there been any discussion here already >> if/how to package 'p-d-r-redux' (which seems to be a (still maintained) >> fork)? > > As we now have #806182, I am hoping for some discussion/advice there how > to exactly handle this in the future (I h

[Python-modules-team] Bug#810088: Please upgrade to latest upstream release (ie: >= 0.32.0)

2016-01-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: python-websocket Severity: normal Hi, The package is 1 year and a half behind upstream. The next version of OpenStack (aka: Mitaka) will need >= 0.32.0. Please upgrade to a newer upstream release. Having a quick look, there's only 3 reverse dependencies, so it should be a rather easy tr

[Python-modules-team] Bug#806182: Will fix python-django-registration RCs shortly (Was: Re: Request to join DPMT && python-django-registration)

2016-01-06 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi list, interested parties, On Mi, 2015-11-11 at 16:39 +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote: > I would like to join the DPM Team. I am a DD, my user name on alioth is > "absurd" (and yes, I read the policy document and I am aware of the git > move ;). seems I am still not in the official members list ht

Re: [Python-modules-team] Question about Django in bpo8

2016-01-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 05 Jan 2016, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > I saw that 1.8.8 has just been uploaded to jessie-backports. > Testing has already 1.9, 1.9.1 to come. > What is the plan in respect to backports? > Will 1.9.x go into bpo8 at some point? > When? Or why not? :~) I don't plan to push 1.9.x in bac

[Python-modules-team] www.packages.debian.org

2016-01-06 Thread Amber Bridgeford | CECV ADTECH Pty Ltd
Hi, I hope you are well. I represent an experienced Video Production & Animation company located in Melbourne and we help promote your company to the world through Cost Effective Corporate Videos! We have produced over 300 videos for small and medium businesses all over the country and