On 19/04/17 at 20:42 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On 2017-04-19 09:26:48, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: pytest
> > Version: 3.0.6-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: stretch sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170
Chris Lamb writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> > test_output_verbose (test_runner.test_debug_sql.TestDebugSQL) ... ok
>> > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
>
> Can't reproduce this locally alas...
I couldn't reproduce this locally. I use a 32bit schroot.
--
Bria
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
On 2017-04-19 09:26:48, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: pytest
> Version: 3.0.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
>
> Hi,
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #860663 [src:pytest] pytest: FTBFS on i386: segfault during tests
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
860663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:31:21 +0100
Source: python-rpaths
Binary: python3-rpaths python-rpaths-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Change
On 19/04/17 at 16:18 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > That's a build log for amd64, not i386.
>
> D'oh!
>
> > python2.7[39117]: segfault at ffc2cffc ip f61a8170 sp
> > ffc2d000 error 6 in libsqlite3.so.0.8.6[f6135000+115000]
>
> I don't have stretch/i386 w
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That's a build log for amd64, not i386.
D'oh!
> python2.7[39117]: segfault at ffc2cffc ip f61a8170 sp
> ffc2d000 error 6 in libsqlite3.so.0.8.6[f6135000+115000]
I don't have stretch/i386 within reach atm but this looks like it has
narrowed it down. Any c
On 19/04/17 at 15:59 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > I tried again and still can; maybe diff your build log with mine to see
> > if something comes up?
>
> Good idea; mine is at:
>
> https://gist.github.com/lamby/e2152b47a6d3d69d29e34975059c6be7/raw
That's a build log for amd64, no
Hi Lucas,
> I tried again and still can; maybe diff your build log with mine to see
> if something comes up?
Good idea; mine is at:
https://gist.github.com/lamby/e2152b47a6d3d69d29e34975059c6be7/raw
(Testsuite runs in parallel so this might be difficult...)
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Hi!
On 19/04/17 at 14:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > > test_output_verbose (test_runner.test_debug_sql.TestDebugSQL) ... ok
> > > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
>
> Can't reproduce this locally alas...
I tried again and still can; may
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > test_output_verbose (test_runner.test_debug_sql.TestDebugSQL) ... ok
> > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
Can't reproduce this locally alas...
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chri
binary:python-rpaths-doc is NEW.
binary:python3-rpaths is NEW.
binary:python-rpaths-doc is NEW.
binary:python3-rpaths is NEW.
source:python-rpaths is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had
python-rpaths_0.13-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-rpaths_0.13-1.dsc
python-rpaths_0.13.orig.tar.gz
python-rpaths_0.13-1.debian.tar.xz
python-rpaths-doc_0.13-1_all.deb
python-rpaths_0.13-1_amd64.buildinfo
python3-rpaths_0.13-1_all.deb
Gre
python-rpaths_0.13-1.dsc has incorrect size; deleting it
python-rpaths_0.13-1.debian.tar.xz has incorrect size; deleting it
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modul
Brian May writes:
> I believe this is fixed in version 1.7.1 which is in unstable.
Unblock request sent:
#860717
--
Brian May
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ma
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
>> File "", line 673, in _load_unlocked
>> File "", line 673, in exec_module
>> File "", line 222, in
>> _call_with_frames_removed
>> File "/<>/passlib/tests/test_totp.py", line 61, in
>> datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(max_time_
Brian May writes:
> This is actually Python 3.6 bug:
Actually that claim makes no sense as Python 3.6 isn't in Debian testing
or unstable yet.
--
Brian May
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists
Source: sorl-thumbnail
Version: 12.3+git20160928-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your p
Source: python-django
Version: 1:1.10.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package fa
Source: pytest
Version: 3.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to bu
Source: python-biplist
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package fail
Source: python-passlib
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package fail
22 matches
Mail list logo
