[Python-modules-team] python-neovim_0.1.13-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Version check failed: Your upload included the source package python-neovim, version 0.1.13-2, however unstable already has version 0.1.13-2. Uploads to experimental must have a higher version than present in unstable. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-neovim_0.1.13-2_amd64.changes

python-neovim_0.1.13-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-neovim_0.1.13-2.dsc python-neovim_0.1.13-2.debian.tar.xz python-neovim_0.1.13-2_all.deb python-neovim_0.1.13-2_amd64.buildinfo python3-neovim_0.1.13-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Deb

[Python-modules-team] Bug#861249: FTBFS: math_test.Vector2TypeTest.test_cross fails

On arm64 and at least one other architecture, the error says: -3.2862601528904633e-16 != 0 It looks as though the test is computing (1.2 * 3.4 - 3.4 * 1.2). Now, the log to base 2 of (1.2 * 3.4) divided by 3.286e-16 is about 53.5. There are 52 bits in the mantissa of a 64-bit float, or 53 includ

[Python-modules-team] Processed: Re: python-biplist: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 860656 + patch Bug #860656 [src:python-biplist] python-biplist: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

[Python-modules-team] Bug#860656: python-biplist: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13

tags 860656 + patch thanks Patch attached. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- diff --git a/tests/test_write.py b/tests/test_write.py index 83c6419..fabd2be 100644 --- a/tests/test_write.py +++ b/tests/test_write.py

[Python-modules-team] Bug#863026: Bug#863026: Broken symlinks break collecstatic on deploy

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:21:30AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > I'm sorry I didn't notice #858811, I guess since it doesn't know it > > affects stable, it got closed and archived. > > Don't be sorry - it affected the same file, but was a different bug, in > a different package. > > Question: Does