[Python-modules-team] Bug#563199: python-xlib is extra, should be optional

Package: python-xlib Severity: minor python-xlib is priority *extra*, but doesn't seem to meet the criteria in DP 2.5: Priorities. Shouldn't it be *optional* instead? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers karmic-updates APT policy: (500, 'karmic-updates'), (500, 'ka

[Python-modules-team] Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

Package: python-keyczar Version: 0.6~b.061709-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) When attempting to build this package with pyversions of 2.6-, the package FTBFS because it expects there to be a "build/lib" directory. Versions of Pyt

[Python-modules-team] Bug#601264: 0001-workaround-deprecated-interface causes the package to require PyCrypto >=2.1.0

Package: python-keyczar Version: 0.6~b.061709-2 Severity: wishlist The patch currently applied to avoid usage of randpool uses functionality not available in earlier versions of PyCrypto. Moreover, this patch was rejected upstream in favor of os.urandom. -- System Information: Debian Release: squ

[Python-modules-team] Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

On 10/24/2010 03:22 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Luke Faraone , 2010-10-24, 13:55: >> When attempting to build this package with pyversions of 2.6-, the >> package FTBFS because it expects there to be a "build/lib" directory. >> Versions of Python after 2.5.x do not cr

[Python-modules-team] Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

tion acceptable to everyone? -- ╒═════╕ │Luke Faraone ╭Debian / Ubuntu Developer╮│ │http://luke.faraone.cc╰Sugar Labs, Systems Admin╯│ │PGP: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046

[Python-modules-team] pyflot_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear maintainer, Your package contains embedded JS libraries, namely jquery.flot.js and jquery.js. Please remove them and depend on the versions already in Debian or include nonminified versions with correct attribution and licensing in debian/copyright. Please instead use the identifier "Expa

[Python-modules-team] python-itsdangerous_0.22-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear maintainer, This new upload adds python-itsdangerous-0.22\docs\_static\itsdangerous.png which appears to have been exported from Inkscape. Since this is not the preferred form of modification for the image, I'm going to have to reject this package. Please reupload repacked without the imag

[Python-modules-team] Bug#803703: python-django-audit-log: FTBFS with Django 1.8

Source: python-django-audit-log Version: 0.7.0-3 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django18-ftbfs Hello, Your package python-django-audit-log depends on python-django. As you might know, Django 1.8 is currently available in experimental. During a test rebuild

[Python-modules-team] Bug#803704: python-django-debug-toolbar: FTBFS with Django 1.8

Source: python-django-debug-toolbar Version: 1:1.2.1-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django18-ftbfs Hello, Your package python-django-debug-toolbar depends on python-django. As you might know, Django 1.8 is currently available in experimental. During a tes

[Python-modules-team] Bug#803707: python-django-tagging: FTBFS with Django 1.8

Source: python-django-tagging Version: 1:0.3.1-4 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django18-ftbfs Hello, Your package python-django-tagging depends on python-django. As you might know, Django 1.8 is currently available in experimental. During a test rebuild of

[Python-modules-team] Bug#803706: python-django-registration: FTBFS with Django 1.8

Source: python-django-registration Version: 1.0+dfsg-2 Severity: important User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org Usertags: django18-ftbfs Hello, Your package python-django-registration depends on python-django. As you might know, Django 1.8 is currently available in experimental. During a test

Re: [Python-modules-team] Django 1.9

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:36 +1100, Brian May wrote: > * Similarly, if we keep Django 1.8 in Debian, Debian maintainers will > become more complacent about ensuring compatibility with future > Django > versions. The new version in experimental is likely to get > forgotten. Instead of packages

Re: [Python-modules-team] Django 1.9

/DebianStretch [2]: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2015/jun/25/roadmap/ -- Luke Faraone signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#816435: TestStartProjectSettings fails on DebCI

Package: python3-django Version: 1.9.2-1 Severity: minor See : == ERROR: test_middleware_classes_headers (project_te

[Python-modules-team] Bug#816434: CVE-2016-2512 and CVE-2016-2513

Source: python-django Version: 1.9.2-1 Severity: important Tags: security Today Django published an advisory for 1.9.3 and 1.8.10. I am investigating whether stable is affected; it is likely. https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2016/mar/01/security-releases/ CVE-2016-2512 > Malicious redirect

[Python-modules-team] FTBFS trouble upgrading python-django to 1.9.4-1

at's wrong here? -- Luke Faraone [1]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2016-django194/python-dj ango_1.9.4-1_amd64.build [2]: https://people.debian.org/~lfaraone/notes/2016-django194/python-dj ango_1.9.2-1_amd64.build PS: Apologies for pushing a tag before I had verified this was working

Re: [Python-modules-team] FTBFS trouble upgrading python-django to 1.9.4-1

On 7 March 2016 at 11:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Overwriting the tag is fine IMO. > > BTW you have not yet pushed/updated the upstream/1.9.x branch. Done, pushed, and uploaded. ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.deb

[Python-modules-team] python-potr_1.0.0~beta7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

description in debian\patches\fix_python_shebang_for_convertkey.patch. -- Luke Faraone === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our con

[Python-modules-team] Bug#728134: python-markdown: Copyright file incomplete

in the package, so I am sure it is possible I missed some entries. When updating debian/copyright also consider updating the upstream URL listed therein. Cheers, Luke Faraone -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-up

Re: [Python-modules-team] [python-django] branch master updated (f8054c2 -> 18d13a0)

I could force-push upstream to track unstable, and put a gbp.conf or whatever in the experimental branch that makes sense, if you like. On Aug 21, 2014 12:32 PM, "Raphael Hertzog" wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Luke Faraone wrote: > > This is an automated emai

Re: [Python-modules-team] [django-announce] [ANNOUNCE] Django 1.7 released

2014-09-02 15:13 GMT-07:00 James Bennett : > Django 1.7 is now available: > > https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2014/sep/02/release-17-final/ I'll prepare the upload for unstable tonight. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs; MIT SIPB lfaraone on irc.[

[Python-modules-team] 1.7.2 in experimental; reasons to not push to unstable?

Hi there, 1.7.3 was issued a few days ago with several security fixes. I've committed an UNRELEASED update in the debian/experimental branch; is there a compelling reason not to push it to unstable? -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs; MIT SIPB lfaraone on irc.[free

[Python-modules-team] Bug#781640: Signature bypass via "alg=none" and HMAC/RSA confusion

Package: pyjwt Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security See http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/01/4 Relevant upstream commit: https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/commit/88a9fc56.patch However, I was not able to get this commit to apply cleanly on the version packaged in

[Python-modules-team] Bug#781640: Downgrading bug severity

On 11 April 2015 at 13:37, Daniele Tricoli wrote: > On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:19:03 Thomas Goirand wrote: > > If the package isn't vulnerable, shouldn't this bug report be closed? If > > that's the case, then I'll let you close it. In the mean while, I'll > > downgrade the severity to normal,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#796757: FTBFS: test failures with Django 1.7

package failed to build from source. This rebuild was done against unstable on an amd64 system, under python-django 1.7.9-1. The log from the build is attached. -- Luke Faraone sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.65.2 (24 Mar 2015) on aqua.sfba.luke.wf

[Python-modules-team] Fwd: Django 1.8 transition

-- Forwarded message -- From: Luke Faraone Date: 23 August 2015 at 18:28 Subject: Django 1.8 transition To: "python-dja...@packages.debian.org" Cc: Barry Warsaw , Raphaël Hertzog Hi folks, I did a test rebuild of packages that depend on python-django under 1.7 (u

[Python-modules-team] Comments regarding flask-multistatic_1.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear maintainer, Please document that example.conf is under CC0 in your next upload. -- Luke Faraone ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python