Re: [Python-projects] pylint #4581 proposed fix

2010-03-23 Thread Donovan Lee Wanhoy
Well i forgot to attach the file. Here it is. Donovan On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Donovan Lee Wanhoy < don.leewan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > sorry I thought I had already asked you: could you please update > functional tests as well so the problem is proven to be fixed and > won't show up ag

Re: [Python-projects] pylint #4581 proposed fix

2010-03-23 Thread Donovan Lee Wanhoy
> sorry I thought I had already asked you: could you please update functional tests as well so the problem is proven to be fixed and won't show up again? Hi, Here is another diff file with the fix, the test case and the test output. Let me know if these are okay or if I need to make any more chan

[Python-projects] astng 0.20.0 and pylint 0.20.0 releases

2010-03-23 Thread Emile Anclin
Hi, We are happy to announce astng 0.20.0 and pylint 0.20.0 releases. Pylint http://www.logilab.org/project/pylint is a static code checker based on Astng, both depending on logilab-common 0.49. Astng http://www.logilab.org/project/logilab-astng builds an enhanced Abstract Syntax Tree for Pyli

Re: [Python-projects] ANN : pylint bug day 2nd edition

2010-03-23 Thread Alexandre Fayolle
On Monday 22 March 2010 18:37:42 Alexandre Fayolle wrote: > Hi everyone > > we'll hold the next `pylint bugs day`_ on april 16th 2010 (friday). If some > of you want to come and work with us in our `Paris office`_, you'll be > much welcome. > > Else you can still join us on jabber / irc: > > *

Re: [Python-projects] pylint #4581 proposed fix

2010-03-23 Thread Sylvain Thénault
On 22 mars 13:39, Donovan Lee Wanhoy wrote: > Hi, Hi Donovan, > Here is a new diff file with the changes. sorry I thought I had already asked you: could you please update functional tests as well so the problem is proven to be fixed and won't show up again? -- Sylvain Thénault

Re: [Python-projects] Fix for Pylint #9018, when using defining-attr-method, method order matters

2010-03-23 Thread Sylvain Thénault
On 22 mars 12:57, Scott Pilkey wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I came up with this fix a little while ago, but haven't gotten a > chance to submit my proposed fix until now. > > It's very straight-forward. In the existing code, you only check the > first item in any node list, when the entire list actual