On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:54PM +, Michael wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 23:24, Daniele Procida wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael wrote:
> >
> >>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ?
> >>(I personally would have said petulant)
> >
> > That's uncalled-for.
On 3 January 2013 23:24, Daniele Procida wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael wrote:
>
>>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ?
>>(I personally would have said petulant)
>
> That's uncalled-for.
>
> It would be gauche to end up trading insults over reply-to setting
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael wrote:
>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ?
>(I personally would have said petulant)
That's uncalled-for.
It would be gauche to end up trading insults over reply-to settings, and we
don't want to be gauche, do we?
Daniele
___
On 3 January 2013 22:41, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:41:31PM +, Michael wrote:
>> On 3 January 2013 17:29, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +, Michael Foord wrote:
>> > > On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > I don't wa
On 3 January 2013 11:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
> As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
>
> Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
> used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
> just that and cutting off conversations, so a f
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:41:31PM +, Michael wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 17:29, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +, Michael Foord wrote:
> > > On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens
> > > wrote:
> > > > I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, stand
On 3 January 2013 17:29, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +, Michael Foord wrote:
> > On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens
> > wrote:
> > > I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard
> > > list behaviour, which is "Reply-To unchanged from the s
On 3 January 2013 17:13, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
> >> like this?
> >>
> >> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a
> >
> > I don't want either of those opti
Amusingly, you've replied to the wrong person - meitham was the one
complaining about the gmail interface.
I hope you don't mind me cc-ing the list, because it kind of illustrates my
point. ;)
I sent my initial message from a client that had both reply and reply-all
buttons side-by-side, so when b
On 3 Jan 2013, at 16:25, Daniele Procida wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, David Walker wrote:
>
>> You could click the "UK Python Users" address to delete that, then copy and
>> paste the email address from the original email.
>> Reply should do what it always does, which is reply to the person wh
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard
> > list behaviour, which is "Reply-To unchanged from the sender's email".
>
> However sincerely (and obstinately) you
>>> my['2p'] == 'reply-to-list'
True
___
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:13, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
>>> like this?
>>>
>>> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a
>>
>> I don't want either of those options
On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
>> like this?
>>
>> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a
>
> I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard
> list behaviour, which is "Rep
On 3 January 2013 17:07, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
>> like this?
>>
>> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a
>
> I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard
> list behaviour, which is "Reply-T
done it for you :)
Jon Ribbens wrote:
"Reply-To unchanged from the sender's email
___
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
> like this?
>
> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a
I don't want either of those options, I want the proper, standard
list behaviour, which is "Reply-To unchanged from the sender's email".
_
Walker
*Sent:* 03 January 2013 16:20
*To:* UK Python Users
*Subject:* Re: [python-uk] The perils of reply-to
+1
You could click the "UK Python Users" address to delete that, then copy
and paste the email address from the original email.
Reply should do what it always does, which is re
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:25:00PM +, Daniele Procida wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, David Walker wrote:
> >You could click the "UK Python Users" address to delete that, then copy and
> >paste the email address from the original email.
> >Reply should do what it always does, which is reply to t
web vote somewhere if
required and stick to that. Ta!
Oli (who is not really bothered either way)
From: python-uk [mailto:python-uk-bounces+oliver.hilton=uktv.co...@python.org]
On Behalf Of David Walker
Sent: 03 January 2013 16:20
To: UK Python Users
Subject: Re: [python-uk] The perils of reply
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, David Walker wrote:
>You could click the "UK Python Users" address to delete that, then copy and
>paste the email address from the original email.
>Reply should do what it always does, which is reply to the person who sent
>the email.
No, this is a list for discussing things
+1
You could click the "UK Python Users" address to delete that, then copy and
paste the email address from the original email.
Reply should do what it always does, which is reply to the person who sent
the email.
On 3 January 2013 15:57, meitham wrote:
> > No. Reply-to-list is almost never co
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:47:31PM +, Stestagg wrote:
>I'm for keeping it, reply-to-list is easier for me,
How can it be easier? Does your mail software really not have
'reply to list' or 'reply to all' buttons?
___
python-uk mailing list
python-
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:21:00PM +, Daniele Procida wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +, Andy Robinson wrote:
> >> In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
> >> developers on this list (well, all but one of the
> No. Reply-to-list is almost never correct. There is even less excuse
> than usual (which would be almost none) on a "technical" list.
+1
I can't get the new gmail web interface to reply to individual instead
of replying to list, not without composing a new email from scratch.
M
_
On 3 Jan 2013 15:19, "Jon Ribbens" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +, Andy Robinson wrote:
> > In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
> > developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the
> > way it currently works?
>
> No. Reply-to-
I'm for keeping it, reply-to-list is easier for me, and definitely more
entertaining, at times
Steve
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Daniele Procida wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +, Andy Robinson wrote:
> >> In the light of this mo
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +, Andy Robinson wrote:
>> In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
>> developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the
>> way it currently works?
>
>No. Reply-to-list is
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +, Andy Robinson wrote:
> In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
> developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the
> way it currently works?
No. Reply-to-list is almost never correct. There is even less excuse
On 03/01/13 11:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
just that and cutting off conversations, so a few years ago th
On 3 January 2013 11:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
> In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
> developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the
> way it currently works?
+1 reply-to-list
The convenience of the many outweighs the fat-fingers of the few.
For the added "entertainment" value alone I'll leave as it is!
But on the other end emails like these could lead to people losing their
job or worst, and only for a momentary lapse of reason (or butter fingers).
So all in weighted, I'm in for changing the reply-to field to the
originator's em
On 3 January 2013 11:57, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html makes a compelling case
> for choosing 'reply to sender' over 'reply to the list'.
>
Yes, I think the mailman user interface points to this article as well
and recommends the default of 'reply to sen
On 3 Jan 2013, at 11:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
> As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
>
> Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
> used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
> just that and cutting off conversations, so a
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Andy Robinson wrote:
>Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
>used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
>just that and cutting off conversations, so a few years ago there was
>a general vote to change it.
>
>In the li
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andy Robinson wrote:
> As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
>
> Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
> used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
> just that and cutting off conversations,
On 3 January 2013 11:49, Álex González wrote:
> I will find really annoying that a default behaviour reply-to-sender in a
> public list.
Agree with Álex FWIW. Slightly unfortunate though this mornings
entertainment has been, I don't think it's that big of a deal. I find it
somewhat infuriatin
As a long time lurker, I'm happy with the way it works currently (ie.
reply-to-list by default). I think it's useful to have to default
conversation be to the community as a whole, even if that sometimes
comes with the added benefit of a demonstration of some users email
skill level.
Plus peo
I will find really annoying that a default behaviour reply-to-sender in a
public list.
My 2 cents :)
Happy New Year and see you on the Dojo!
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andy Robinson wrote:
> As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
>
> Currently the emails are set to 'reply
As a list admin I supposed I ought to ask this again.
Currently the emails are set to 'reply to the list' by default. It
used to be 'reply to sender' but too many people found they were doing
just that and cutting off conversations, so a few years ago there was
a general vote to change it.
In t
40 matches
Mail list logo
