> Can pythoncom.PumpWaitingMessages() generate a COM error? In
> particular if
> there is a running instance of IE that is terminated by some
> external event,
> say the user or a script, will
> pythoncom.PumpWaitingMessages() generate a
> COM error since the automation object is gone?
PumpWai
> I dig a bit more and it appears that the python win32 com
> module requires all target typelibs to be in the app current
> directory. Otherwise the cache is systematically re-generated
> anytime a new scripting engine is created.
This should not be the case, and there should be no assumption
Hi Mark,
For your info I contacted O'Reilly about the book after being told by a
bookseller it appears "out of print"
Here is their response
> Hello,
>
> "Python Programming On Win32" is still "In Print".
> We have it on a "Print on demand" status.
> Every month or so we print enough to fill our
I dig a bit more and it appears that the python win32 com module requires all
target typelibs to be in the app current directory. Otherwise the cache is
systematically re-generated anytime a new scripting engine is created.
Am I doing something wrong ? Thanks in advance...
-mab
-Original
Can pythoncom.PumpWaitingMessages() generate a COM error? In particular if
there is a running instance of IE that is terminated by some external event,
say the user or a script, will pythoncom.PumpWaitingMessages() generate a
COM error since the automation object is gone?
Thanks for any clues.
My misunderstanding.
As far as I know now absent some error all I really expect is S_OK. I'm
adding in the python.com_error checking now and starting careful testing.
If something other than S_OK turns up in the IE interface I'll let you know.
Thanks.
Regards,
Richard
|> As to what codes I'm ex
On 5/27/07, Mark Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/27/07, Mark Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm try to add a property sheet to my shell extension project, but
> > > > found that pywin32 doesn't support it. What's the best
> > thing I can do,
> > > > other than hoping it will
Teodor Ivanov wrote:
> The statement '"global group" can only contain domain users' is true only for
> MS domains running in mixed mode ( I mean the OS of primary domain controller
> is
> Windows 2000 or 2003 ), but if it is in native 2000 or native 2003 mode, then
> the global security groups c
Tim Roberts probo.com> writes:
>
> Wolf, Matthias ALRT/ELD wrote:
>
> >Thanks for your answer!
> >
> >You are right, but in the group 'GROUP' are users and groups and I want to
receive both. Probably I need
> something like "win32net.NetGroupGetGroups" instead of
"win32net.NetGroupGetUsers". Is
> As to what codes I'm expecting ... heaven only knows. I'm
> working with IE 7
> now and it appears willing to return most anything under
> various boundary conditions.
I guess I was asking if you are expecting any 'success' codes other than
S_OK. These are rare, and always explicitly documente
Mark,
Aside from the example I posted earlier, I adopted the approach you outlined
in your note, ie. I placed any exception results in class instance storage.
It looks like that will work although I've got a good deal more development
to do before being sure.
As to what codes I'm expecting ... he
11 matches
Mail list logo
