Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question (can we close this?)

2008-04-04 Thread Marcus Low
Hi Mark, > Don't underestimate the complexity of writing > asynchronous IOCP based applications in *any* language - just because > something is written in C# and *only* targets one way of handling sockets > doesn't make it the best or most reliable solution. No doubt even given the best mechanism

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-04 Thread Mark Hammond
> http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6223207-description.html > > The advantage of scalability and performance of using IOCP/asynch for > writing servers vs berkeley style select in Windows > is a known thing for windows programmers. ICOP is built right into the > Windows system drivers with the pu

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-03 Thread Marcus Low
L PROTECTED]> To: "Python-Win32 List" Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:44 AM Subject: Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question > Marcus Low wrote: >> Hi Waldemar, >> >> Thanks, i have bought the twisted book and the journey begin. The COM >> was &

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-03 Thread Tim Roberts
Marcus Low wrote: > Hi Waldemar, > > Thanks, i have bought the twisted book and the journey begin. The COM was > optimal for windows because its asynch api winsock2 and > that beats berkeley socket "select" anyday on Windows, That is superstitious nonsense. The asynchronous winsock API had to b

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-03 Thread Marcus Low
Osuch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Marcus Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Marcus Low <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> >

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-02 Thread Tim Roberts
Marcus Low wrote: > > Thank you for the alternative view, yes i have the twisted downloaded > and inspecting it prior to this question. > My only concern would be this is because the said COM component is > made to run optimally in Windows and i am not sure i have the same > assurance when it c

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-01 Thread Waldemar Osuch
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Low <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Thank you for the alternative view, yes i have the twisted downloaded and > inspecting it prior to this question. > My only concern would be this is because the said COM component is made to > run optimally in

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-01 Thread Marcus Low
ist" Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 6:07 AM Subject: Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question > Marcus Low wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am aggressively trying to try and use python for my team's sub >> commercial project. However we are using a com component and i ha

Re: [python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-01 Thread Tim Roberts
Marcus Low wrote: > Hi, > > I am aggressively trying to try and use python for my team's sub > commercial project. However we are using a com component and i have the > example given in C#. It looks very simple to use and elegent in C# but > i need to do the same in python (minus the GUI of co

[python-win32] A shameless COM question

2008-04-01 Thread Marcus Low
Hi, I am aggressively trying to try and use python for my team's sub commercial project. However we are using a com component and i have the example given in C#. It looks very simple to use and elegent in C# but i need to do the same in python (minus the GUI of course) The C# example is : http