> Interesting. You're saying that the normal
> del kb is not enough to clean this up?
Whoops, user error. I had declared my com object as global so I could delete it
from somewhere
else, but forgot to declare it as global before deleting it
Works fine now, thanks.
And for anyone coming dow
Alec Bennett wrote:
>
>> What is preventing you from shutting down in an orderly way?
>>
>
> I'm controlling an onscreen keyboard through a Com interface and when I
> attempt to close it I get
> a Com Server error telling me there are still connections to the Com object,
> am I sure I want t
> You're talking about a fairly serious design flaw here.
Agreed.
> What is preventing you from shutting down in an orderly way?
I'm controlling an onscreen keyboard through a Com interface and when I attempt
to close it I get
a Com Server error telling me there are still connections to the C
Alec Bennett wrote:
> I'm ending task on a process that has a system tray icon, which works but it
> leaves an icon behind
> in the system tray, which only goes away if I mouse over it. Can anyone think
> of a way to force a
> refresh of the system tray without mousing over it?
>
> I know this is
I'm ending task on a process that has a system tray icon, which works but it
leaves an icon behind
in the system tray, which only goes away if I mouse over it. Can anyone think
of a way to force a
refresh of the system tray without mousing over it?
I know this is adding duct tape over duct tape,
