Hi again,
thank you for sharing your insight. Will need to take another look at
Docker, sounds like a great approach.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On Wednesday, 13 July 2016, Andres Weber wrote:
> Oh man I didn't know there was a container for this. Thanks Marcus, this
> is
You are returning a cross product when smooth is false. A cross product is
a vector. Also as I said before, your example does not show implementation of
getCrossProduct() so it is not clear what actually you are returning. But
again, as I mentioned earlier, if your method name is getCrossProduct()
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:39 AM likage wrote:
> I do not have any code to show. This is something that I have copied and
> paste somewhere..
>
> But if say I manage to have some values and I set a variable as 'test.
> asMPoint()', am I correct to say that it will try to
I do not have any code to show. This is something that I have copied and
paste somewhere..
But if say I manage to have some values and I set a variable as 'test.
asMPoint()', am I correct to say that it will try to read in 3 values and
it will be using the class Point, asMPoint function?
And
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, 4:51 AM likage wrote:
> Why do you thing it would be returning a list vs a dict vs other? And I
>> don't mean these questions in a condescending way. I think it would be good
>> to hear your thought process on how you view the way a class works. Then
>
> Why do you thing it would be returning a list vs a dict vs other? And I
> don't mean these questions in a condescending way. I think it would be good
> to hear your thought process on how you view the way a class works. Then we
> can address the specifics. What do you expect to get back
Hi Cesar,
What this does is enable your PySide2-compatible software to also run on
any other binding. What this means in practice is that when you eventually
re-factor your Qt 4 scripts for Qt 5 then they can continue to work on Qt 4
if you use Qt.py.
Sorry for any confusion.
Best,
Marcus
On
Hi,
So you have to write for qt5 bindings in order to fallback to older
bindings?
How does this help to limit refactoring on old scripts? (i.e. using the new
QtWidgets instead of patching QtGui).
Don't get me wrong, I have done and worked with similar solutions on
different studios and I fully
Also empty containers bool test to false, so if you ever implement
__iter__ and __len__ in one of your base classes the bool test will
probably give you unexpected results.
tl;dr:
- *is* / *is not* test identity
- == != > < test value
Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are
I would comment on the second part of your question :
Regarding the getNormal() method, the short answer is yes. To write clean
readable code, the only thing that is of importance (more so in python) is
to name your methods, variable with utmost care. Since getNormal() would
return a MVector in
Hello,
Today, Maya 2017 was released. It comes with a bunch of changes, where one
change is of particular interest to me as a Python developer; PySide has
been replaced with PySide2 (as a result of Autodesk replacing Qt4 with Qt5).
This essentially makes all PySide/PyQt scripts written for Maya
11 matches
Mail list logo