I am trying to find the difference between two lists - charLs and rigLs but
as I tried to use the list and set methods as I found online, it is giving
me very different results.
In the example below, I should be seeing *female01* and *elderly01* in the
diff1 results but yet I am getting *male01
Think what you're probably after is the difference call in sets, ie, return
the difference between the two sets
diff2 = list(set(rigLs)^set(charLs))
What the minus sign does is a return elements in the first arg that aren't
in the second, where as the ^ sign returns the actual difference. That sa
Hey Mark,
Thanks for getting back to me. I am still not getting the results, seems to
be the unicode error as I am appending the items into list.
It works unless i took out the u in each of the list.. Is there any ways
that I can take out the unicode or do I need to do some more splittings?
On
I'm not getting any issues getting the different even with sets of mixed
unicode and ascii objects. Can you give a specific example that can
reproduce your error?
Also this can be a little bit easier to read:
a = set([u'male01', u'female01', u'elderly01'])
b = set([u'male01'])
a.difference(b)# {u
If you can post an example where you show us the actual content of the two
list you are comparing, it will be much easier to help you find what might
be wrong.
Something like:
a = {1, 2, 3}
b = {2, 3, 4}print a - b # Remove items from a that exist in b#
1print b - a # Remove items in b that exi
Jinx, buy me a coke
On 21 November 2014 08:20, Justin Israel wrote:
> I'm not getting any issues getting the different even with sets of mixed
> unicode and ascii objects. Can you give a specific example that can
> reproduce your error?
>
> Also this can be a little bit easier to read:
>
> a = s
I took back what I mentioned about the unicode. It is somewhat hard for me
to give an example, as publishedRef is an in-house module.
Tried out the method supplied by Justin, it is still printing [u'male01',
u'female01', u'elderly01'] which is the same results as diff2 - in my first
post...
I
Forget the Maya specific parts. If it is related to the sets then you
should be able to reproduce it with generic Python. If you can't, then it
is some other mistake or mishandling going on in your code.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 9:35 PM likage wrote:
> I took back what I mentioned about the unicode.
By doing a simple set example using generic Python, it is working with no
issues. I am achieving the results that I had wanted see.
So I guess this may be something due to the Maya handling part.. I thought
if appending the name, it will not affect anything much
--
You received this message be
Adding on, seems to be an issue around the listRelatives part in my case
On Friday, November 21, 2014 5:17:15 PM UTC+8, likage wrote:
>
> By doing a simple set example using generic Python, it is working with no
> issues. I am achieving the results that I had wanted see.
>
> So I guess this may
Hey Mark,
Be aware that when you do set(list) you discard the duplicates on the list,
so you may be comparing different things...
by the way, aren't sets deprecated?
Cheers!
Eduardo
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
> Think what you're probably after is the difference call in
aren’t sets deprecated?
Certainly not! You may be thinking of the top of the link I posted above as
reference. That is in regards to the “sets” module, which looks to have
been merged into top-level Python functionality. Quite the opposite of
deprecation. :)
On 21 November 2014 12:50, Eduardo G
Sorry, my bad...
Don't remember quite well why when i used it in a previous python version
it gave me
a deprecation warning...
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marcus Ottosson
wrote:
> aren’t sets deprecated?
>
> Certainly not! You may be thinking of the top of the link I posted above
> as refe
Question - are your results that are inside of rigLs truly the direct
result of a call to cmds.listRelatives()? Are you sure that the objects
inside of rigLs are truly strings (or unicode)?
I ask because I've noticed that in maya 2015, a repr was added to
MObjects... which would be nice, except t
14 matches
Mail list logo
