On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:32:04AM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> My basic suggestion is either
>
> (a) don't do anything. If an exception happens you have already have a
> problem. A signal being lost is not such a big deal.
That is certainly an option. If the code isn't changed from its
the program as robust as possible is what I'm aiming for, so I would
really hope to devise some approach better than an abrupt failure.
That is pretty much what I do - my central exception handler
allows the user to click continue and keep working, even if some plugin
blew up.
This is prett
# The following was supposedly scribed by
# Noel Grandin
# on Thursday 19 May 2005 08:43 am:
>>the program as robust as possible is what I'm aiming for, so I would
>>really hope to devise some approach better than an abrupt failure.
>
>That is pretty much what I do - my central exception handler
>
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:42:13AM -0500, Art Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:32:04AM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > My basic suggestion is either
> >
> > (a) don't do anything. If an exception happens you have already have a
> > problem. A signal being lost is not such a big
