Would that allow us to gain enough functionality to allow syncing
appointments and emails without Outlook? Since it is a big issue with
SunBird and other Free Software calendering projects, I think it would be
a big boost to the projects popularity if we can get COM access. I wish I
could contribut
- Original Message -
From: "Duane Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [PythonCE] PythonCE Digest, Vol 30, Issue 6
> Hi, I've been lurking on the list and playing a little with PythonCE.
> Very cool stuff here. Thanks to all the devel
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [PythonCE] Empty project or Human Friendly Project?
> On 6 Jan 2006 at 10:09, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
>
>> Either would be fine by me. The wiki at murkworks is alre
I'll get a copy of 2.3.5 installed over the next few days, then post
my steps of what it took to get Tkinter going.
cheers
S
--
Stewart Midwinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype, GoogleTalk, iChatAV, MSN, Yahoo: midtoad
AIM:midtoad1
___
Pytho
- Original Message -
From: "Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 3:28 AM
Subject: [PythonCE] Tkinter in pythonce...
> Hi.
>
> I installed the CAB file in my PDA.
> The first thing I wanted to test was the GUI capabilities, so I tried to
>
Sorry, I was mistaken about one thing though: python23.zip\\lib-tk is not in
sys.path by default (only Lib\\lib-tk is, but the Tkinter files are in the
zip so that doesn't help).
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Stewart Midwinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luke Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECT
thanks for the extra details on 2.3.5. I can see now that it's
different from 2.3.4. and more compatible with the desktop version.
I'd better install it and find out more!
my comments about osce.py were directed at 2.3.4. Perhaps the newer
version doesn't need it, or may not be able to use it.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Barish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 3:38 AM
Subject: [PythonCE] Compiled version of Python 2.3.5 for Windows CE?
Thank you for the additional information. The description of
PythonCE-2.3.5-20051223-setup.exe in the re
- Original Message -
From: "Stewart Midwinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PythonCE] Tkinter in pythonce...
> Rodrigo, no desesperes!
>
> Where do you have your python located?
>
> Y
Jeffrey, have you had a previous version of python installed? In
previous versions there was a script called setup-registry.py. If
you previously used this, maybe your registry does not now point to
the new python installation. OTOH, if you never had python installed
before, look for such a fil
Rodrigo, no desesperes!
Where do you have your python located?
You probably need to add some code that tells python where to look for
modules. you can do that with:
sys.path.append('\\SD Card\\Program Files\\Python\\Lib')
sys.path.append('\\SD Card\\Program Files\\Python\\Lib\\python23.zip\\lib-t
Hi, I've been lurking on the list and playing a little with PythonCE.
Very cool stuff here. Thanks to all the developers, many thanks. I'm
not a very talented coder, yet, but am willing to do the footwork of
getting an SF page for the project. It seems to me that everyone would
want this. Are there
Hello,
Thomas Heller wrote:
>> I cannot answer these questions, but I'll try to get comtypes working.
>> Are there 'interesting' COM objects on a Pocket PC 2003 to experiment
>> with?
I would _love_ to get COM access from inside PythonCE because I want to
be able to control Pocket Outlook. Here's
This is just conjecture on my part, but having been elbow-deep in the
Python 2.3.4 code, I don't think multi-platform was much of a concern
for Python in the early days. When you don't have a multi-platform
(in this case Multi-OS) architecture in place early-on, the code slowly
becomes less and le
On 6 Jan 2006 at 19:06, Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich wrote:
> I'm new to the list, but I'm paying a lot of attention to every
> message and I must say that today the discussion got very spicy. Can
> you explain a little what dealing with the "political issues of
> getting integrated with the mainline
Hi, David:
I'm new to the list, but I'm paying a lot of attention to every message
and I must say that today the discussion got very spicy.
Can you explain a little what dealing with the "political issues of
getting integrated with the mainline development" means?
The Nokia implementation of Pyt
Tim Lesher wrote:
> I think one of the issues that really hurts PythonCE is the fact that
> it's not part of the mainline, so its availability and status is
> always questionable.
This is indeed the big issue. When I did the original PythonCE port
of 2.3.4 one of my big objectives was to do it as
On 1/6/06, Brad Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Older versions of Windows CE have big incompatibability issues.
New ones, too. :-) Especially on non-PocketPC devices.
> Anyway.. it would be great to get our changes back into the mainline code,
> but I
> don't think it's a simple problem to
On 6 Jan 2006 at 14:30, Tim Lesher wrote:
> Just my opinion, but I don't think PythonCE will get much traction
> unless and until someone decides to clean up the build and contribute
> it back to the core. -- Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For sure,
and a few years back I started down that road
On 6 Jan 2006 at 10:37, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
> I see on the 'contributors' page on the Murkworks site the following
> comment: "Please ask Brad for setting your username and password if
> you want participate."
>
> So it seems that there is a manual process for getting approved to
> edit that
Thank you for the additional information. The description of
PythonCE-2.3.5-20051223-setup.exe in the release notes says that the program
registers the .cab file and allows easy installation, but doesn't mention
that it includes the binary. Maybe that's obvious to people who know Windows
CE b
On 6 Jan 2006 at 10:09, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
> Either would be fine by me. The wiki at murkworks is already set up
> and specific to this project, so easier to start with. I note however
> that the last entry there was 3 years ago. Brad Clements, the wiki
> admin, is one of the pythonce devel
I think one of the issues that really hurts PythonCE is the fact that
it's not part of the mainline, so its availability and status is
always questionable.
A few weeks ago on the core python-dev mailing list, Guido weighed in on this:
"My reason for wanting people to contribute ports back is that
On 6 Jan 2006 at 9:59, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
> tienes razón Rodrigo!
>
> The SF project doesn't have a home page. Perhaps one of the current
> developers, bkc, kashtan, pfalcon can make it happen or delegate the
> job to one of us (I can help). Do we get a space on SF to create the
> home pa
Hi.
I installed the CAB file in my PDA.
The first thing I wanted to test was the GUI capabilities, so I tried to
run the following code (which compiles nicely in the PC version):
from Tkinter import *
root = Tk()
myContainer1 = Frame(root) ### (1)
myContainer1.pack() ### (2)
root.mai
I know CPython 1.5.2 is deprecated, but does anyone have a PythonCE
version 1.5.2 compiled for XScale processors?
--
http://www.peter.dembinski.prv.pl
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
I apologize to the developers. I've just found the CAB file.
But I will keep my ideas about the lack of human-friendlyness of the
project.
One of the important things about a future homepage is that we all users
of pythonce will be able to post samples and code in order to make the
thing more a
On 1/6/06, Luke Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not obvious to me how to edit the MurkWorks wiki but hopefully editing
> is just disabled temporarily.
I see on the 'contributors' page on the Murkworks site the following comment:
"Please ask Brad for setting your username and password if
That would be very useful, Steward...
I'm very interested in helping, too.
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
SourceForge provides hosting with nice features like scripting and MySQL,
documented here:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4297&group_id=1
Alternatively, a project administrator can change the "Home Page" link to
point to another site.
It's not obvious to me how to edit th
On 1/6/06, Luke Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the web page, I agree that it would be nice to have something there
> but writing web pages is not really my area of expertise or interest, so you
> are welcome to write something yourself. I would prefer a wiki for the main
> documentati
If you are not at all familiar with SourceForge then I can imagine that you
might have missed the binary releases. First go here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=104228
Under the package "pythonce" you will see a number of "releases", including:
Python-2.3.5-20051223
Pyth
tienes razón Rodrigo!
The SF project doesn't have a home page. Perhaps one of the current
developers, bkc, kashtan, pfalcon can make it happen or delegate the
job to one of us (I can help). Do we get a space on SF to create the
home page, or do we have to host it elsewhere? If so, I note that t
Andy Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding the Win32 extensions...
>
> Is there a document that lists:
> 1. What does work.
> 2. What wont work because it's not relevant to WinCE
> 3. What could work given some extra work
>
> I am particularly interesting in Win32.com.client which as I
> u
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. In an earlier message you replied
to my announcement of the Python 2.3.5 release, but now you seem to be
asking for a binary release. If so, have you tried the release?
Rodrigo and Jeffrey, I also invite you to download the binaries mentioned in
my emai
I'm sure that the pythonce project will be one of the most exiting
things happening in the future of mobile devices. I hate java, so i will
support python till the end.
But as Andy Baker just said "lots of people who are competent in Python
are lost in the world of makefiles" and I must say that
I've always had a complete nightmare everytime I've tried to compile
something from source.
I'm sure lots of people who are competant in Python are lost in the
world of makefiles and such-like so I would like to vote for always
keeping an up-to-date binary available.
Andy Baker
On 1/6/06, Rodrig
Hi.
I'm having the same troubles.
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
Would it be possible for someone to post a compiled version of Python 2.3.5
for Windows CE? I have been having difficulties downloading eMbedded Visual
C++ 4.0.
--
Jeffrey Barish
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mai
39 matches
Mail list logo
