On Apr 29, 2005, at 1:43 AM, Kent Quirk wrote:
I've spent all day trying to get my rather large port of a Python/C+
+ app to package properly using py2app. Let's just say I've learned
a lot. :-)
But not quite enough, apparently.
I now have a packaged .app with (I hope) everything I need inside
Title: strange py2app problem?
I've spent all day trying to get my rather large port of a Python/C++ app to package properly using py2app. Let's just say I've learned a lot. :-)
But not quite enough, apparently.
I now have a packaged .app with (I hope) everything I need inside it. If I run
On Apr 28, 2005, at 5:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 28, 2005, at 5:59, Dethe Elza wrote:
I'm using 2.4.1 and will be generally be running the latest stable
release. Using py2app makes it so convenient to just include the
Python I'm working with, and it's now easy to install the latest
Sort of. It depends on what versions of Windows you care about. The
older ones don't ship with the version of the runtime that Python 2.4
is built against. It's just a dll that you need to get in their hands,
but you'll need to read the license to see if you're allowed to
redistribute it or
On Apr 28, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
I'm using Python 2.4.1 with wxPython 2.5.4.1 Unicode build. While
tracking down messy little problems with string-vs-unicode stuff, I
put some code like this in my app:
defEng = wx.GetDefaultPyEncoding()
print 'default encoding is %s' % defE
I don't know about that. If I'm building an Open Source app for Mac and
Windows (py2app and py2exe standalones), using Python 2.4.1, is there a
problem?
Charles Hartman
On Apr 28, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
Whichever one ships with new Macs (presumably 2.3.5).
Since I use the same Pyt
Whichever one ships with new Macs (presumably 2.3.5).
Since I use the same Python version on all platforms, I'll be
sticking with 2.3 for a while. The biggest issue is the
legal mess with redistributing a Microsoft DLL with Python 2.4
on Windows.
If that wasn't an issue, I'd be seriously consideri
My mistake
>>import bas_init
> What's this?
Opps... Forgot about that
I never intended to release this to the public I'll send that out
as soon as I get into the office... It is a standardized Application
Initialization routine
I have created a Startup Item for macos x server 10.3.9 that invokes a
shell script to start a python process. The startup item is called but
the script fails. The app works if invoked from the terminal. The log
simply says the script failed.
The Startup Item script cd's to the appropriate dire
On Apr 28, 2005, at 17:32, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Subclassing the bdist_mpkg command. Adding extra stuff to the package
requires explicit support for bdist_mpkg inside the setup.py.
OK - something to explore.
The idea is that it should be a standard repository that anyone can
and should contribute
I'm using Python 2.4.1 with wxPython 2.5.4.1 Unicode build. While
tracking down messy little problems with string-vs-unicode stuff, I put
some code like this in my app:
defEng = wx.GetDefaultPyEncoding()
print 'default encoding is %s' % defEng
If I run this from within the WingIDE debugger, I
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:27, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I do something equivalent to this (where both python installations
have a pth file pointing to the src directory of py2app svn trunk, and
the scripts dir of py2app is in my PATH):
python2.4 `which bdist_mpkg` -z
python2.3 `which bdist_mpkg` -z
Thank
On Apr 28, 2005, at 5:59, Dethe Elza wrote:
I'm using 2.4.1 and will be generally be running the latest stable
release. Using py2app makes it so convenient to just include the
Python I'm working with, and it's now easy to install the latest
Python, there's less and less reason to fiddle around
Whichever one ships with new Macs (presumably 2.3.5).
Bill
> As I plan to update my Python packages for Tiger, I'd like to get some
> feedback on which Python people are going to use, the system Python
> (which I'm surmising is 2.3.x) or Bob's 2.4.1 package. I'm inclined to
> support just one Pyt
Bob Ippolito writes:
> Only if you want to be. Python 2.4.1 is the only Python I "support".
> I still build packages for 2.3, only because it takes an extra few
> seconds to do so, but I don't test them anymore.
That's too bad, Bob. If as rumored 2.3.5 is the Python on Tiger, I'd
expect that
[incidental gripe]
I don't understand why -- sometimes, not always -- it can take two
hours or more for a message I send to show up on the list. Just server
gaggage somewhere?
Charles Hartman
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http
On Apr 28, 2005, at 5:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:27, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I do something equivalent to this (where both python installations
have a pth file pointing to the src directory of py2app svn trunk,
and the scripts dir of py2app is in my PATH):
python2.4 `w
On Apr 28, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
Bob Ippolito writes:
Only if you want to be. Python 2.4.1 is the only Python I "support".
I still build packages for 2.3, only because it takes an extra few
seconds to do so, but I don't test them anymore.
That's too bad, Bob. If as rumored 2.3.5 i
What, do without generator expressions?? I don't think so.
Charles Hartman
On Apr 28, 2005, at 12:03 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 27, 2005, at 11:59 PM, Dethe Elza wrote:
I'm using 2.4.1 and will be generally be running the latest stable
release. Using py2app makes it so convenient to just incl
I have created a Startup Item for macos x server 10.3.9 that invokes a
shell script to start a python process. The startup item is called but
the script fails. The app works if invoked from the terminal. The log
simply says the script failed.
The Startup Item script cd's to the appropriate dire
20 matches
Mail list logo