Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Intel Python status?

2006-01-25 Thread skip
Kent> What's the current status of any semi-official build of Python on Kent> Intel? We actually need to build it without readline support, Kent> haven't been able to figure out how (configure --without-readline Kent> doesn't seem to do it). It builds if we download Gnu readline

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread bear
Bob Ippolito wrote: > One thing to note is that you can probably build with minimal patching > (via the universal SDK), but the result will only run on Mac OS X 10.4 > and later. It requires major patching in order to create a Python > binary that is Mac OS X 10.3 or 10.2 compatible. My goal i

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread bear
Kevin Ollivier wrote: > Oh, BTW, I forgot to mention this but Apple's changes to build Python > 2.3 Universal are available from here: > > http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/tarballs/other/python-16.tar.gz > > > The fixes dir has all the changes they made to the source files. sweet!

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Jan 25, 2006, at 2:59 PM, bear wrote: > Kevin Ollivier wrote: >> How exactly are you doing this? Are you passing these flags into >> configure, or editing the configure script? I'm seeing that it does >> matter where in the configure script the options are added. From my >> tests so far, the t

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi, On Jan 25, 2006, at 2:59 PM, bear wrote: > Kevin Ollivier wrote: >> How exactly are you doing this? Are you passing these flags into >> configure, or editing the configure script? I'm seeing that it >> does matter where in the configure script the options are added. >> From my tests so

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread bear
Kevin Ollivier wrote: > How exactly are you doing this? Are you passing these flags into > configure, or editing the configure script? I'm seeing that it does > matter where in the configure script the options are added. From my > tests so far, the test 'failures' in the configure script are >

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi, On Jan 25, 2006, at 11:02 AM, bear wrote: > > > Kevin Ollivier wrote: >> Take out the -syslibroot part (which is only needed for libtool, >> IIUC) >> and make sure the "-arch ppc -arch i386" bit is in LDFLAGS as well. >> That's how I got wxWidgets building Universal binaries. :-) >> > I had

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-01-25 Thread bear
Kevin Ollivier wrote: > Take out the -syslibroot part (which is only needed for libtool, IIUC) > and make sure the "-arch ppc -arch i386" bit is in LDFLAGS as well. > That's how I got wxWidgets building Universal binaries. :-) > I had *just* read your wx-dev post and was going to ask about the

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] ANN: ActivePython 2.4.2.10 is now available

2006-01-25 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi Bear, On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:55 PM, bear wrote: [snip] > The --prefix option will tell configure where to place the files so > you > don't overwrite your current python. > > I am looking forward to seeing what the UB related options are - > when I > have tried the ones mentioned in the Tec